nickthequick
- 39
- 0
Hi,
I am currently confused about something I've run across in the literature.
Given that
[itex]\nabla^2\phi = \phi_{xx}+\phi_{zz} = 0[/itex] for [itex]z\in (-\infty, 0][/itex]
and
[itex]\phi_z = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} |A|^2[/itex] at z=0.
for [itex]A= a(x)e^{i \theta(x)}[/itex].
The author claims that
[itex]\phi_x = A_xA^*-AA^*_x[/itex] at z=0
and where A* represents the complex conjugate.
The author then claims a more general formula for [itex]\phi_x[/itex] can be found in terms of the Hilbert Transform.
I do not understand how the author finds the expression for [itex]\left.\phi_x\right|_{z=0}[/itex]. Also, although I'm vaguely aware that Hilbert Transforms can be used to find Harmonic conjugates, I don't see how that can be exploited in this case.
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks,
Nick
I am currently confused about something I've run across in the literature.
Given that
[itex]\nabla^2\phi = \phi_{xx}+\phi_{zz} = 0[/itex] for [itex]z\in (-\infty, 0][/itex]
and
[itex]\phi_z = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} |A|^2[/itex] at z=0.
for [itex]A= a(x)e^{i \theta(x)}[/itex].
The author claims that
[itex]\phi_x = A_xA^*-AA^*_x[/itex] at z=0
and where A* represents the complex conjugate.
The author then claims a more general formula for [itex]\phi_x[/itex] can be found in terms of the Hilbert Transform.
I do not understand how the author finds the expression for [itex]\left.\phi_x\right|_{z=0}[/itex]. Also, although I'm vaguely aware that Hilbert Transforms can be used to find Harmonic conjugates, I don't see how that can be exploited in this case.
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks,
Nick