Harmonic Functions, conjugates and the Hilbert Transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between harmonic functions, their conjugates, and the Hilbert Transform. The user, Nick, seeks clarification on the derivation of the expression for the derivative of a harmonic function, specifically at the boundary condition where \( z=0 \). The author asserts that the expression for \( \phi_x \) can be expressed as \( A_xA^*-AA^*_x \) at \( z=0 \) and suggests that the Hilbert Transform can provide a more general formula for \( \phi_x \). The confusion arises from the application of the Hilbert Transform in finding harmonic conjugates in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Hilbert Transform and its applications
  • Knowledge of complex functions and conjugates
  • Basic differential equations, particularly Laplace's equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of harmonic functions from boundary conditions
  • Learn about the application of the Hilbert Transform in complex analysis
  • Explore the concept of harmonic conjugates in greater detail
  • Investigate examples of using the Hilbert Transform to solve differential equations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and engineers who are working with harmonic functions, complex analysis, and the Hilbert Transform in their research or applications.

nickthequick
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am currently confused about something I've run across in the literature.

Given that
\nabla^2\phi = \phi_{xx}+\phi_{zz} = 0 for z\in (-\infty, 0]

and

\phi_z = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} |A|^2 at z=0.

for A= a(x)e^{i \theta(x)}.

The author claims that

\phi_x = A_xA^*-AA^*_x at z=0

and where A* represents the complex conjugate.

The author then claims a more general formula for \phi_x can be found in terms of the Hilbert Transform.

I do not understand how the author finds the expression for \left.\phi_x\right|_{z=0}. Also, although I'm vaguely aware that Hilbert Transforms can be used to find Harmonic conjugates, I don't see how that can be exploited in this case.

Any suggestions are appreciated!

Thanks,

Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nickthequick said:
Hi,

I am currently confused about something I've run across in the literature.

Given that
\nabla^2\phi = \phi_{xx}+\phi_{zz} = 0 for z\in (-\infty, 0]

and

\phi_z = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} |A|^2 at z=0.

for A= a(x)e^{i \theta(x)}.

The author claims that

\phi_x = A_xA^*-AA^*_x at z=0

and where A* represents the complex conjugate.

The author then claims a more general formula for \phi_x can be found in terms of the Hilbert Transform.

I do not understand how the author finds the expression for \left.\phi_x\right|_{z=0}. Also, although I'm vaguely aware that Hilbert Transforms can be used to find Harmonic conjugates, I don't see how that can be exploited in this case.

Any suggestions are appreciated!

Thanks,

Nick

What is this publication?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K