MHB Has anybody seen this looks kind double Mittag-Leffler

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarrah1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the double Mittag-Leffler function, represented by the series involving parameters t, a, b, and α. It is noted that this function serves to solve specific fractional differential equations and extends the classical Mittag-Leffler function. The original poster expresses confusion about the notation's appearance, particularly the size of the symbols used. Sarrah confirms the function's identity and its relevance in mathematical applications. Understanding this function can be crucial for those working with fractional calculus.
sarrah1
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi
I got stuck with this, it looks like a double mittag-leffler. Has anybody seen it

$$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{j=o}^{\infty} \frac{{t}^ {\alpha (j+k)} {a}^{k} c {b}^{j}} {\varGamma(\alpha j+\alpha k+\alpha+1)} $$

thanks

I wonder why the symbols look so small in the post. the numerator is t raised to alpha(j+k) times a^k times constant c times b^j
thanks
sarrah
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a double Mittag-Leffler function, which is defined as:$$M(t,a,b,\alpha) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{t^{\alpha(j+k)}a^kb^j}{\Gamma(\alpha j+\alpha k+\alpha+1)}.$$This function is used to represent solutions of certain fractional differential equations. It is a generalization of the classical Mittag-Leffler function.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K