Have pulsed fission reactors got any potential in nuclear energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pulsed fission reactors, such as the TRIGA-Mark-II at the University of Mayence, are primarily utilized for research purposes rather than commercial power generation. These reactors operate at pulse powers of 250 MW for short durations, typically in the tens of milliseconds, to study transient behaviors of nuclear fuel. The technical limitations of pulsed operation include concerns over fuel integrity, pressure pulses in cooling systems, and the potential for fuel rupture due to high temperatures. Utilities do not employ pulsed operations in power reactors due to these inherent risks and the preference for steady-state power generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pulsed fission reactor principles
  • Familiarity with reactor types, specifically TRIGA reactors
  • Knowledge of nuclear fuel behavior under transient conditions
  • Awareness of reactor safety protocols and limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of TRIGA reactors
  • Study the effects of delayed neutrons in nuclear fission
  • Examine the safety measures for managing pressure pulses in reactors
  • Explore the applications of pulsed reactors in nuclear research
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, researchers in nuclear physics, and professionals involved in reactor design and safety assessments will benefit from this discussion on pulsed fission reactors.

DyerMaker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
How did you find PF?: Searched for some forum about mechanical engineering in Google

Do pulsed nuclear fission reactors have any chances to be used in nuclear power?
If the answer is "no" is that just because of no need in pulsed operation mode while having a common one, are there any more complicated issues like ones with delayed neutrons or both these reasons?

Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thank you for you reply.
I am asking about pulsed fission reactors, like ones described here: https://www.euronuclear.org/glossary/pulsed-reactor/
It is claimed that's the only reasonable way to use them is to use them in research studies, but not explained why.
 
DyerMaker said:
Thank you for you reply.
I am asking about pulsed fission reactors, like ones described here: https://www.euronuclear.org/glossary/pulsed-reactor/
It is claimed that's the only reasonable way to use them is to use them in research studies, but not explained why.
Note in the Euronuclear article, it states "FRMZ, research reactor of the university of Mayence in Germany, type TRIGA-Mark-II; pulse power 250 MW, permanent power 0.1 MW." Pulses are typically in the 10's of ms (milli-seconds) for looking at 'transient behavior' of nuclear fuel, usually in response to a reactivity accident, which is a 'hypothetical' accident. The 'permanent' of 0.1 MW should be 'steady-state' power. After a pulse/test, the fuel is normally inspected to see if integrity is maintained.

Power reactors operate normally at constant power, although a reactor may 'load-follow'. Power maneuvering may be unrestricted, i.e., no restriction on power ascension (ramp) rates, but normally it's a few %/hr to 10-40%/hr, depending on the conditioning of the fuel. Often, if the fuel mechanical integrity is not limiting, the balance of plant (response of turbine/generator) is limiting. Another concern would be pressure pulses in the cooling system and potential for rupture of the piping or coolant boundary, as well as fatigue of the piping/pressure boundary.

There are technical limits on peak fuel enthalpy (stored energy) and temperature. With about 30% of fission products being isotopes of Xe and Kr (noble gases) with another significant fraction being Br, I, Rb, Cs, which are volatile well below the melting point of UO2/MOX fuel, the fuel could potentially balloon or rupture is the fuel temperature became too great, especially near the surface of the fuel.

Pulses in 'pulsed' reactor operation are completed well before the longer-lived delayed neutron precursors release neutrons, but on may observe their effect in the 'tail' after the pulse.

Utilities (power reactor operators) do not pulse their power reactors, nor would they plan to do so.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and DyerMaker
Astronuc said:
Note in the Euronuclear article, it states "FRMZ, research reactor of the university of Mayence in Germany, type TRIGA-Mark-II; pulse power 250 MW, permanent power 0.1 MW." Pulses are typically in the 10's of ms (milli-seconds) for looking at 'transient behavior' of nuclear fuel, usually in response to a reactivity accident, which is a 'hypothetical' accident. The 'permanent' of 0.1 MW should be 'steady-state' power. After a pulse/test, the fuel is normally inspected to see if integrity is maintained.

Power reactors operate normally at constant power, although a reactor may 'load-follow'. Power maneuvering may be unrestricted, i.e., no restriction on power ascension (ramp) rates, but normally it's a few %/hr to 10-40%/hr, depending on the conditioning of the fuel. Often, if the fuel mechanical integrity is not limiting, the balance of plant (response of turbine/generator) is limiting. Another concern would be pressure pulses in the cooling system and potential for rupture of the piping or coolant boundary, as well as fatigue of the piping/pressure boundary.

There are technical limits on peak fuel enthalpy (stored energy) and temperature. With about 30% of fission products being isotopes of Xe and Kr (noble gases) with another significant fraction being Br, I, Rb, Cs, which are volatile well below the melting point of UO2/MOX fuel, the fuel could potentially balloon or rupture is the fuel temperature became too great, especially near the surface of the fuel.

Pulses in 'pulsed' reactor operation are completed well before the longer-lived delayed neutron precursors release neutrons, but on may observe their effect in the 'tail' after the pulse.

Utilities (power reactor operators) do not pulse their power reactors, nor would they plan to do so.
Thank you!
 
Well, there's always Project Orion, but we can forget about using it near Earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K