Having trouble understanding sources of hetroscedasticity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rabolisk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the sources of heteroscedasticity in time series models, specifically through the equation Yt = B1 + B2x2t + B3x3t + ... + Bkxkt + γπ + εt. The participant questions the variance formulation, particularly why γt is outside the variance operator and not squared. It is concluded that if γ is a constant, it should indeed be squared when outside the variance. Additionally, the introduction of heteroscedasticity can occur by increasing γt over time, assuming π is a random variable with consistent behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time series analysis
  • Familiarity with heteroscedasticity concepts
  • Knowledge of variance and its properties
  • Proficiency in regression analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of heteroscedasticity in regression models
  • Learn about the ARCH and GARCH models for modeling time series volatility
  • Explore the role of constant terms in variance equations
  • Investigate methods for detecting and correcting heteroscedasticity
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, econometricians, and data analysts who are working with time series data and need to understand the implications of heteroscedasticity in their models.

Rabolisk
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey. Iam trying to understand how specification of the equation can lead to hetroscedasticity. This is stright out of my notes.

Yt=B1+B2x2t+B3x3t+...+BkXkt+[itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi+[/itex]ε[itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]


Yt=B1+B2x2t+B3x3t+...+Bkxkt+ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex]

where
ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex] = εt + [itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi[/itex]t

Since Var(εt) = [itex]\sigma[/itex][itex]^{2}_{ε}+[/itex][itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]var([itex]\varpi[/itex]t)

I don't understand the variance part. I know that the variance of any epsilon is [itex]\sigma[/itex]2, but why does the γt go outside the variance operator? I know it's a constant so why isn't it γ2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rabolisk said:
Hey. Iam trying to understand how specification of the equation can lead to hetroscedasticity. This is stright out of my notes.

Yt=B1+B2x2t+B3x3t+...+BkXkt+[itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi+[/itex]ε[itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]


Yt=B1+B2x2t+B3x3t+...+Bkxkt+ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex]

where
ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex] = εt + [itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi[/itex]t

Since Var(εt) = [itex]\sigma[/itex][itex]^{2}_{ε}+[/itex][itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]var([itex]\varpi[/itex]t)

I don't understand the variance part. I know that the variance of any epsilon is [itex]\sigma[/itex]2, but why does the γt go outside the variance operator? I know it's a constant so why isn't it γ2?

If γ is a constant the it's a typo and γ should be squared when outside the variance.

This seems a time series, so one to way to introduce heterocedasticity in this model is by increasing γt over time, I am assuming ϖ is a random variable with the same behavior over time (it's not clear in your formulation since sometimes they both have the t subscript at the end but not in the beginning).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K