Hey. Iam trying to understand how specification of the equation can lead to hetroscedasticity. This is stright out of my notes.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Y_{t}=B_{1}+B_{2}x_{2t}+B_{3}x_{3t}+......+B_{k}X_{kt}+[itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi+[/itex]ε[itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]

Y_{t}=B_{1}+B_{2}x_{2t}+B_{3}x_{3t}+......+B_{k}x_{kt}+ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex]

where

ε[itex]^{*}_{t}[/itex] = ε_{t}+ [itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]\varpi[/itex]_{t}

Since Var(ε_{t}) = [itex]\sigma[/itex][itex]^{2}_{ε}+[/itex][itex]\gamma[/itex][itex]^{}_{t}[/itex]var([itex]\varpi[/itex]_{t})

I dont understand the variance part. I know that the variance of any epsilon is [itex]\sigma[/itex]^{2}, but why does the γ_{t}go outside the variance operator? I know it's a constant so why isn't it γ^{2}?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Having trouble understanding sources of hetroscedasticity

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**