Having trouble with this normalization

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bladibla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normalization
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing the excited state wavefunction of the hydrogen atom, specifically the function ψ = (2 - r/a_0)e^a, where a = -r/a_0. Participants express confusion about integrating the squared wavefunction and determining the correct form of R^2 for the integration. They clarify that the radial integral should include terms like r^2 dr, and emphasize the importance of using spherical coordinates correctly. Questions arise about the exponent in the exponential function and whether angular integrals should be included in the normalization process. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in normalization calculations and the need for careful attention to integration variables and factors.
Bladibla
Messages
357
Reaction score
1
1.Question.

the unnormalized excited state wavefuction of the H atom is:
\psi = ( 2 - r/a_0 ) e^a

where a = -r/a_0

Normalize the function to one.

2. My attempts.

I tried 'integrating' the psi*psi, i.e. I squared the above wavefuction.

N^2\int_{0}^{\infty} R^2e^{2a}\int_{0}^{\pi}sin \theta d\theta\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi =1

From here, I got confused with the examples. The second and third integrations were obviously 2 and 2\pi, but the first integration I'm getting confused as to what to put as R^2 and I'm getting the same answer as the examples because when I done the calculation, the power to which R is the same with every question, which was a^3_0/4

Hence: a^3_0/4*2*2\pi =1/N^2

Hence I worked out N from this equation, but the answer I got was:

\psi =(1/\pi a^3_0)^{1/2}e^{-r/a_0}

Which is the same as every other damn normalized wavefuction in the book.

I think I'm having trouble actually understanding how R^2 is translated from the original wavefuction to the actual integration, hence my immense trouble to working out what R is. Can anyone help with this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid I can't parse what you're saying. Could you try to clean it up?
 
Sorry, Had a lot of trouble getting used to the Latex type setting. Updated it so you can read it a bit.. hopefully.
 
The radial integral is
\int_{0} ^{\infty} (4 -4a+a^{2}) e^{-2a} a^{2} da /a_{0} ^{2}
where a = r/a_{0}. These are straightforward integrals that are found in any integral table.
 
Last edited:
thank you!
 
Wait, when I calculated the first integral, I got:

\psi = (2 - a)e^{-a}

hence:

First integral: \int_{0}^{\infty}(4-4a+a^2)(e^{-2a})a_0da
=a_0\int_{0}^{\infty}(4-4a+a^2)(e^{-2a})da

since: a = -r/a_0

da/dr = 1/a_0
da = (1/a_0)dr
(a_0)da = dr
I'm not sure I understand how you got the a^2/a_0^2 Could you, if you have the time, care to elaborate?
 
Last edited:
Change variables from r to a = r/a_{0}, you have to remember that in sphereical coordinates you have r^{2} dr for the integration over all r space. Check my original work because I forget to put in factors normalization until I check my units at the end. and I usually screw up early in the am...
 
Last edited:
Still having trouble with the first integration part.. I'll rewrite the original equation:

\psi = (2-r/a_0)e^{-r/a_0}
 
Let \alpha = r/a_{0}, then

|\psi |^{2} = (2-\alpha)^{2} e^{-2\alpha} so the integral becomes

\int_{0} ^{\infty} (4-4\alpha+\alpha^{2})e^{-2\alpha} a_{0} ^{3} \alpha^{2} d\alpha

From here you have yo do the integrals, the can be found in an integral table... In general you have

\int _{0} ^{\infty} x^{n} e^{-ax} dx = \frac{n!}{a^{n-1}} for a > 0, n an integer. From here you can find everything you need to calculate the normalization factor.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I have nothing helpful to add. Just two (maybe stupid) questions as I try to follow along:
In the original equation should the exp. of e be a/2?
Should the integrals of the theta and Phi functions be included in the normalization?
 
  • #11
cgw said:
I have nothing helpful to add. Just two (maybe stupid) questions as I try to follow along:
In the original equation should the exp. of e be a/2?
Should the integrals of the theta and Phi functions be included in the normalization?

The problem may have been as written.

Now as for the angular integrals, the normnalization of them are included in the integral in the form of factors of \pi which up to this point have been ignored. The part of the original posters problem is that they are forgeting that the form of the volume element in spherical coordinates is r^{2} dr \cos(\theta) d \theta d \phi.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
627
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K