Calculate Energy Needed for Flexinol Contraction in Vacuum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jai Sankar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heating Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy required for the contraction of a flexinol wire in a vacuum compared to air. Participants explore the implications of resistance, power dissipation, and heat loss in different environments, focusing on theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the total resistance of the flexinol wire and suggests using the formula for power dissipation (I²R) to determine the energy needed for a 1-second contraction.
  • Another participant questions how much heat would be lost to air compared to a vacuum, indicating a need for clarification on thermal dynamics in different environments.
  • Some participants propose that painting the wire a certain color affects energy loss, with black paint increasing loss and a polished surface decreasing it, while noting that infrared radiation behaves similarly in both air and vacuum.
  • One participant argues that in a vacuum, heat escapes faster due to the absence of air, suggesting that the temperature of the wire would rise more quickly compared to when it is in air.
  • A later reply provides governing equations for heat loss due to convection and radiation, discussing the complexity of calculating natural convection and the iterative process required to estimate steady-state temperature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of the environment (air vs. vacuum) on heat loss and energy requirements, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions and dependencies in their calculations, such as the convective coefficient and temperature dependence, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

Jai Sankar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a flexinol wire, and it has a resistance of 0.11 ohms/inch and it requires 4000mA for a 1 second contraction. I was wondering how much energy was required for a 1 second contraction and if I were to heat the flexinol under a vacuum, how much less energy would be required. The flexinol is a cylinder with a radius of 0.020 in and is 3 inches long, a density of 0.235 lb/in^3, and a specific heat of 0.2 cal/g * °C.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
(1)

You have 3 inches of wire so total resistance is 0.33 ohms . Current is 4 Amps .

Power dissipated by a resistance is given by I2R Watts .

One Watt = One Joule / second - so how many Joules are needed for a 1 second ON time ?

(2)

Another calculation could tell you what voltage and Amp-Hour capacity a battery would need to be to supply required current and to give the required number of seconds ON time for your application .

(3)

I don't think that having wire in vacuum as opposed to air would make much difference to power consumption .

nb: Flexinol
 
Last edited:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
 
Paint it flat black and energy loss is greater, polish it like a mirror, energy loss would be less. Infrared radiates pretty close to equally well in air or in a vacuum. Air does add a convection component, but for 1 second isn't long enough to establish any significant convection current.
 
Jai Sankar said:
How much heat would be lost to air rather than a vacuum?
in a vacuum it will do it's thing slower because the heat can escape the boundary layer faster. the air-to-wire boundary layer is like "R" in thermal insulation equations, thus heat will escape slower so temp will rise faster.
 
Natural convection is a tricky subject, but for a simple geometry like a wire in free air you can make some assumptions to make calculations a bit more manageable.

Your governing equations for heat loss per unit length would be:
  1. Convective Heat Loss: q'_c = \bar hπD(T_s - T_∞)
  2. Radiation heat Loss: q'_r = επDσ(T_s^4 - T_∞^4)
  • q'_c - Convective heat loss
  • q'_r - Radiative heat loss
  • \bar h - Convective coefficient
  • D - Wire diameter
  • ε - Wire emissivity
  • σ - Stefan-Boltzmann constant
  • T_s - Wire temperature
  • T_∞ - Environment temperature
The dimensionless parameters used in the calculation of natural convection are where it gets a little tricky. You're looking for the convective coefficient but it depends on the temperature, so to start you'll guess a temperature and then calculate out the convective coefficient. You can follow an iterative process for estimating steady state temperature until you're able to balance heat loss with power input. So (guess temperature) → (calculate heat loss) → (compare to electrical power put in) → (repeat step 1).

To get the convective coefficient follow these steps:
  1. Calculate Rayleigh number: Ra_{D}=\frac{g\beta\left(T_{s}-T_{inf}\right)D^{3}}{\nu\alpha}
  2. Calculate Nusselt number: \overline{Nu}_{D}=\left\{0.60+\frac{0.387Ra_{D}^{1/6}}{\left[1+\left(0.559/Pr\right)^{9/16}\right]^{8/27}}\right\}^{2}
  3. Calculate convective coeffcient: \overline{h}=\frac{k}{D}\overline{Nu}_{D}
where:
  • \beta=1/T_{s}
  • Prandtl number: Pr = \frac{ν}{α} (ratio of the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K