A What are the quantum numbers used to label helium atom eigenfunctions?

HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am nit sure what you mean by "non-perturbative," as it is a 3-body problem, hence no analytical solutions.

Using the base Hamiltonian, the quantum numbers you get are those that make up the term symbol, L, S, J, and MJ.
 
Last edited:
There are also variational methods. With suitably chosen basis functions you can get quite accurate results -- see for example chapter 3 in "Intermediate Quantum Mechanics" by Bethe and Jackiw.
 
HomogenousCow said:
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
  • Drake, G. W. F., & Van, Z. C., Variational eigenvalues for the S states of helium. Chemical Physics Letters 229 (1994), 486-490.
  • Yan, Z. C., & Drake, G. W. F., High precision calculation of fine structure splittings in helium and He-like ions. Physical review letters, 74 (1995), 4791.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
HomogenousCow said:
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
The following may be relevant: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Semiclassical_theory_of_helium_atom
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top