A What are the quantum numbers used to label helium atom eigenfunctions?

HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am nit sure what you mean by "non-perturbative," as it is a 3-body problem, hence no analytical solutions.

Using the base Hamiltonian, the quantum numbers you get are those that make up the term symbol, L, S, J, and MJ.
 
Last edited:
There are also variational methods. With suitably chosen basis functions you can get quite accurate results -- see for example chapter 3 in "Intermediate Quantum Mechanics" by Bethe and Jackiw.
 
HomogenousCow said:
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
  • Drake, G. W. F., & Van, Z. C., Variational eigenvalues for the S states of helium. Chemical Physics Letters 229 (1994), 486-490.
  • Yan, Z. C., & Drake, G. W. F., High precision calculation of fine structure splittings in helium and He-like ions. Physical review letters, 74 (1995), 4791.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
HomogenousCow said:
Are there any results on the structure of the helium atom eigenfunctions? By this I'm referring to the non-perturbative structure of the eigenfunctions, AKA what are the quantum numbers that one would use to label the eigenfunctions?
The following may be relevant: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Semiclassical_theory_of_helium_atom
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top