Help Diagonal matrix similar to upper triangular matrix?

Click For Summary
A 4x4 diagonal matrix with distinct entries is similar to a lower triangular matrix with the same diagonal values and arbitrary lower triangular entries. The similarity holds true regardless of the upper or lower triangular form, as both share the same eigenvalues, which are the diagonal entries. Understanding matrix diagonalization clarifies this relationship, as diagonalizable matrices can be transformed into each other through similarity transformations. The discussion emphasizes that diagonal matrices and triangular matrices are fundamentally linked through their eigenvalues. The concept of diagonalizability is crucial for grasping why these matrices are similar.
thebuttonfreak
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I have been thinking about this for a week and I simply can't get anywhere.

consider a 4x4 diagonal matrix such that if a11 > a22 > a33 > a44, (0's everywhere else)

then it is similar to another matrix with the same diagonal but 0's in upper triangular part an any numbers in the lower triangular part.

These seem to be similar regardless of whether a11 > a22 > a33 > a44


help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you learned the concept of matrix diagonalization yet? It's a lot easier to understand why the 2 matrices are similar if you already have. BTW, I think you meant lower triangular matrix in the thread title, but it is true that under your specified conditions, the triangular matrix, be it upper or lower, is indeed similar to that of the diagonal one.

Assuming that you know what is matrix diagonalization, note that the eigenvalues of a triangular matrix (denoted A) are the values of the diagonal entries. With that in mind, and if the diagonal entries are distinct (a sufficient but not necessary condition), then the matrix is diagonalizable. And if the matrix is diagonalizable, note that the diagonal matrix so formed (denoted D) would have the eigenvalues of the triangular matrix as its diagonal entries. And therefore, since (P^-1)AP=D , by diagonalizability, the two matrices D and A are similar.

I'm still thinking of how to explain it without the concept of diagonalizability.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K