Help for quickest and clearest route for differentiation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter kauymatty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the coordinates of points on a specific curve where the gradient equals a given value. The curve is defined by the equation y=1/3x^(3/2)-x^(1/2).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for simplifying the equation, including substitution and squaring both sides to eliminate square roots. There are questions about how to handle negative powers and the use of common denominators.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered suggestions for manipulating the equation to facilitate finding the solution. There is an ongoing exploration of different algebraic techniques, and participants are engaging with each other's ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of trial and error in the original post, and some participants express uncertainty about handling negative powers and the algebraic steps involved.

kauymatty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the coordinates of the points on these curves at which the gradient has the given values.

y=1/3x^(3/2)-x^(1/2), gradient=3/4


The Attempt at a Solution



Basically the problem I have isn't really finding the answer because...

x^(1/2)-x^-(1/2)=6/4[/b] and then from here I just used trial and error to find 4, but I want to know how I would follow it through with the algebra, i.e. only has x on one side as one term e.g. x= ans.


Thanks in advance,

kauymatty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try substituting z = x^(1/2), then cast the result into the form az^2 + bz + c = 0.
 
I'd square both sides of the equation. That'll eliminate the square roots completely.
 
vela said:
I'd square both sides of the equation. That'll eliminate the square roots completely.

Thanks vela and banders, but after eliminating the roots I would still have the negative power, would I just get a common denominator by multiplying through with 16x as the denominator? (big of a noobish question XD)
 
Multiplying through by 16x would be fine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K