No. The radius of the large circle is NOT twice the radius of the small circle. To find the ratio, Assume the length of each side of the equilateral triangle is L. If you drop a perpendicular from one vertex to the opposite side, it bisects that side. You now have a right triangle with hypotenuse of length L and one leg of length L/2. Letting "x" be the length of the other leg, by the Pythagorean theorem, you have L2= x2+ L2/4 or x2= 3L2/4. x= [itex]\sqrt{3}/2[/itex]. Now draw another line from another vertex to the center of the circle. Then you have another right triangle with hypotenuse of length R, the circumference of the circle, one leg of length L/2 and the other of length [itex]\sqrt{3}/2- R[/itex]. Now the Pythagorean theorem gives [itex]R^2= L^2/4+ ((\sqrt{3}/2)L- R)^2[/itex] which reduces to [itex]L^2/4+ (3/4)L^2- \sqrt{3}Lh= 0[/itex] (the "R^2" terms cancel) so [itex]R= L/\sqrt{3}= \sqrt{3}L/3[/itex].
Remember that the first vertical line has length [itex]\sqrt{3}L/2[/itex]. We now see that can be divided into a short distance of [itex]\sqrt{3}L/3[/itex] and a longer distance of [itex]\sqrt{3}L/2- \sqrt{3}L/2= \sqrt{3}L/6[/itex]. The length of the longer part is the radius of the larger circle, and the length of the shorter part is the radius of the smaller circle.
[tex]\frac{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}L}{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{6}L}= 3[/tex]
not 2.