Help me understand how bolts take less load than members

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidwinth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bolts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the mechanics of a bolted connection in machine design, specifically how the load is distributed between a bolt and the members it connects under external forces. The focus is on the implications of stiffness ratios and preloading in the context of elastic behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the tension in the bolt (1271.42 lbs) can be considered less than the compression in the members (71.42 lbs) based on the example provided in the machine design book.
  • Another participant suggests that the bolt's clamping force is influenced by static friction and implies that a diagram would clarify the situation.
  • A participant clarifies that both the bolt and members are elastic and that the book does not mention friction, asserting that all necessary information was provided in the original question.
  • One participant explains that the load shared by the bolt is small due to its lower stiffness compared to the members, leading to the conclusion that the members remain in compression despite the external load exceeding the preload.
  • A later reply provides calculations showing the load shared by the bolt (171.43 lbs) is significantly less than that shared by the members (1028.57 lbs), illustrating the disparity in load distribution.
  • Another participant expresses confusion but later shares insights from a related thread, suggesting that the stiffness ratio affects how the external force impacts the bolt and the clamped parts, leading to a nuanced understanding of the mechanics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the load distribution between the bolt and the members, with some agreeing on the influence of stiffness ratios while others remain confused about the initial claims. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the role of friction and the specific conditions under which the calculations apply. The discussion also highlights the dependency on the definitions of stiffness and the elastic behavior of the components involved.

davidwinth
Messages
103
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
A bolt holds two members in compression, and is said to take less of the external load even when the numbers say different.
Hello,

I am studying through a machine design book and ran across this confusing statement which summarizes the results of an example problem. The problem has a bolt and nut that together hold two members in compression. The stiffness ratio is given as $$K_m = 6K_b$$. The bolt is preloaded with $$P_i = 1100 lbs$$ and the members have an external load (that tries to pull them apart) of $$F_e = 1200 lbs$$. The example then finds the resultant compression in the members and the tension in the bolts. The tension in the bolt is 1271.42 lbs and the compression in the members is 71.42 lbs. Then the book gives this statement: "In this problem, it can be seen that the proportion of the load shared by the bolt is very small because the stiffness of the bolt is low when compared to the members."

How is 1271.42 less than 71.42? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I suspect you are missing something, and have also left it out of your question.

I assume the bolt is elastic, and provides a clamping force that is multiplied by static friction between the members.

A diagram would help.
Please provide a reference to the book title, author, edition, and page number.
 
The book is called, "The Machine Design Problem Solver" page 215, and there is no consideration of friction mentioned at all. Of course both the bolt and the members are considered as elastic (hence the reference to their stiffnesses). I have not left out anything that I can see. The entire example is only two equations which give the results I showed above. As for a picture, it looks much like the one below except the two members are of equal thickness and there are external forces pulling the members apart. I typed an exact quote of the summarizing the findings. Thank you.

1710361189992.png
 
I believe it is all to do with understanding the implied direction of the applied forces. Here is the problem...

Problem 4-5
Consider a bolted connection shown in Figure 1, in which the stiffness coefficients are given as Km ≈ 6 Kb. If the connection is preloaded with Pi = 1100 lbs. and the members are externally loaded with Fe = 1200 lbs., find the resultant compression of the machine parts and the tension of the bolt.
bolt1.jpg

bolt2.jpg

In this problem, it can be seen that the proportion of the load shared by the bolt is very small because the stiffness of the bolt is low when compared to the members. The result is that the machine parts are still in compression even after applying an external load greater than the preload. Therefore, there is no separation of the parts.
 
davidwinth said:
"In this problem, it can be seen that the proportion of the load shared by the bolt is very small because the stiffness of the bolt is low when compared to the members."
The load shared by the bolt is:
$$\frac{K_b f_e}{K_b+K_m} = 171.43\text{ lb}$$
The load shared by the members:
$$\frac{K_m f_e}{K_b+K_m} = 1028.57\text{ lb}$$
Thus:
$$171.43\text{ lb} < 1028.57\text{ lb}$$
 
I was also confused by this. Here is a related thread.
Post #6 from that thread contains the insight that made it click for me.

I think I finally got an intuition about why that happens.
When the external separation force is applied, the tension force on the bolt must increase but simultaneously, the force the clamped parts were doing on the bolt diminishes. The net effect on the bolt depends on the stiffness ratio of the joint.
In the case of the clamped parts being WAY stiffer than the bolt, it is possible to increase the external force until it surpasses the preload so it causes gapping without almost affecting the bolt. At the instant where gapping occurs, all the external force travels exclusively through the bolt but before that, the bolt did not see a significant increment in tension.

1701614468775.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
23K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
18K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
26K