Help Me Understand P-Violation from Lederman's Experiment

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lucretius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of P-violation as demonstrated in Leon Lederman's experiment involving positive pion particles produced in a cyclotron. The experiment reveals that when a positive pion decays into a positive muon and its corresponding neutrino, the neutrino exhibits only left-handedness, contradicting the expectation of parity conservation which would require both left and right-handed neutrinos. This observation confirms that parity conservation is violated, as all neutrinos produced are single-handed. The confusion arises from the relationship between the helicity of the muon and the neutrino, emphasizing that if the neutrino has only left helicity, the muon must also exhibit left helicity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, specifically P-violation
  • Familiarity with the properties of muons and neutrinos
  • Knowledge of helicity and its measurement in particle physics
  • Basic comprehension of cyclotron operation and particle decay processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the original paper on Lederman's experiment to gain deeper insights into P-violation
  • Study the concept of helicity in particle physics and its implications for particle interactions
  • Explore the role of parity conservation in quantum mechanics and its experimental tests
  • Investigate other experiments that demonstrate P-violation, such as those involving weak interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, physicists interested in quantum mechanics, and anyone studying the implications of P-violation in fundamental interactions.

Lucretius
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
I just finished reading a book, The Quantum World, but have gone back and looked at some interesting and confusing parts again. One involving P-violation I cannot understand for the life of me and was hoping someone would help me be able to.

The author discussed an experiment by Leon Lederman and others, where they produced positive pion particles in a cyclotron. This particle subsequently decayed into a positive muon and it's neutrino form. The muon is experimentally shown to always be single-handed. The neutrino is of the same left-handedness as the muon.

This next part is what confuses me. He says that "if parity were conserved, half of the neutrinos created would be left-handed and half would be right-handed. Experiment indicates that they all were single-handed (meaniung that parity conservation is as totally violated as it could be!)

I don't get it. If the muon is experimentally shown to be single-handed, why is it a problem that it's neutrino is? Am I reading this wrong? Can the positive muon be both left and right-handed, but the neutrino is only left-handed, and that's the P-violation? I'd like to understand this experiment and it's conclusion of P-violation, but I simply don't with the wording given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check this link out.
http://ccreweb.org/documents/parity/parity.html
I was unablet to figure out (not on campus- so no access to online articles) which was the correct paper for the Lederman experiment. But a simple search on scholar.google.com should be able to allow you to track down the original article which should clear up any questions you have.
Cheers,
Ryan
 
If P were conserved, both the mu and the neutrino would have equally rlght and left helicity. Since the pion has spin zero, if the neutrino has only L helicity (violation of P), the muon must also have L helicity.
They talk about measuriing the helicity of the muon, because that is easier to do than for the neutrino.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K