Help needed to find the flow potential function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the flow potential function for a given 2-D velocity field defined as V = [4y - x(1+x)] i + y(2x+1) j. The user attempted to derive the potential function Φ by integrating the velocity components u and v, but found that the resulting function did not satisfy the necessary conditions for an exact differential. Specifically, the mixed partial derivatives were unequal, indicating that a flow potential does not exist for this velocity field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2-D incompressible flow dynamics
  • Familiarity with Laplace's equation in fluid mechanics
  • Knowledge of partial differential equations
  • Experience with vector calculus and differentiability conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for exact differentials in vector fields
  • Learn about the implications of the Laplace equation in fluid dynamics
  • Explore techniques for solving partial differential equations
  • Investigate the concept of potential flow and its limitations
USEFUL FOR

Fluid mechanics students, mathematicians specializing in differential equations, and engineers working with incompressible flow analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Hells_Kitchen
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Here is the catch:

We are given a 2-D velocity flow incompressible, irrotational of the form:

--> ^ ^ ^ ^
V = u i + v j = [4y -x(1+x)] i + y(2x+1) j

and we are asked to find the flow potential which obeys the Laplace Eq. for 2-D incompressible, irrotational flow: dΦ = u dx + v dy

in other words:

∂Φ
---- = u
∂x

∂Φ
---- = v
∂y

I integrated the first one and then the second one and compared the two functions and combined the terms, but at the end the Φ does not satisfy the first equation only the second one.

Another technique, I integrated the first function with respect to x and Φ is expressed as 4xy - x^2/2 - x^3/3 + f(y) = Φ (x,y)

now I differentiate with respect to y and equate it to v:

4x - f'(y) = y(2x+1) which solves to f(y) = xy^2 + y^2/2 -4xy + C

Plug it in the above expression and get:

Φ (x,y) = xy^2 + y^2/2 - x^2/2 - x^3/3 + C

now the first partial diff. eq is not satisfied but the first is.

Can someone explain what is wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What reason do you have to thinks such a potential exists?

If there exist [itex]\phi[/itex] such that [itex]d\phi = udx+ vdy[/itex] (as long as u and v are differentiable) then it must be true that the mixed derivatives are equal:
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x \partial y}= \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}= \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}= \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial y\partial x}[/tex]
Here it is clear that that is not true: [itex](4y -x(1+x))_y= 4 \ne (y(2x+1))_x= 2y[/itex]. This is not an "exact differential" and there is no "flow potential".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K