louvig
- 3
- 0
Last edited:
The discussion centers around understanding Equation 3.6 from the book "Covariant Physics" by Moataz H. Emam, specifically regarding the transformation of a displacement vector in the context of point particle mechanics. Participants seek clarification on the derivation and the rules applied, such as whether it involves the chain rule or product rule.
Participants generally agree on the need for clarification regarding the equation, but there are differing views on the specifics of the derivation and notation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the transformation rules applied.
Some participants mention the need for clearer notation and context, indicating that the understanding of the equation may depend on these factors. There is also mention of a potential typo, which could affect interpretation.
Sorry. I tried a screenshot from Kindle instead. I am able to click on it in my smartphone and make it full screen and is legible. The author is showing the covariance of classical mechanics using Einstein index notation. In this instance he is showing the transformation of the position vector which is straightforward and then the transformation of the derivative of the position vector. His point is to show ot transforms like a tensor and is therefore invariant.PeroK said:It's a bit difficult to read. Also, perhaps needs some context re the author's notation.
louvig said:View attachment 328307I am a physics enthusiast reading Covariant Physics by Moataz H. Emam. In his chapter about Point Particle mechanics there is a transformation equation for a displacement vector. I don't see how he arrived at the final equation 3.6. Is it a chain rule or product rule? Can't seem to figure it out. See attachment. Thanks in advance for any insight.