Programs Help Understanding the PhD Application Process

AI Thread Summary
PhD students typically conduct research aligned with grants provided by companies to universities, overseen by professors. This means students may not have complete freedom to choose their research topics, as they often need to align with the funding source. When submitting a Research Interest Summary, students should express their interests in a way that correlates with existing labs and potential funding, whether by general topics or specific questions. The funding source significantly influences the flexibility of research topics, with company-funded programs often having stricter requirements compared to government-funded ones. Ultimately, it is advisable for students to communicate with potential supervisors to clarify expectations and opportunities.
YoshiMoshi
Messages
233
Reaction score
10
So if I'm understanding correctly, companies provide grants to universities to conduct certain research. The professors oversee the grants and have PhD student help contribute to the research under that grant.

Based on this, it seems that PhD students don't conduct research "any question" they want, but topics in correlation with the grant from companies?

So in a Research Interest Summary that I'm supposed to submit along with my application, am I supposed to propose conducting research to answer a specific question that may or may not correlate with a grant, or just a topic that correlates with a lab that exists within the university?

For example, a university has a plumbing lab that a professor oversees. Should I express interest in conducting researching in the:
  1. Plumbing industry
    1. Example, just express interests in doing research on the plumbing industry
  2. A specific subtopic in the plumbing industry
    1. Example, alternate materials in plumbing industry
  3. A specific question under a subtopic in the plumbing industry
    1. Example, what are the effects of using polyurethane as pipes in plumbing (I'm just making this up)

I would seem to me that I should just describe my interest in doing research in the plumbing industry? I don't know which research grants will be available to me to work under when I actually start my research and am done with my course work. The grant may dictate certain topics or questions have research done on them.

I think I might be overthinking this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How PhD students are funded and the limitations to their research project is highly dependent on many factors, including where the money comes from and why and where the position is. There is no one general rule.
 
Number 2.
 
It depends, ask the potential supervisor.
If it's a company-funded program it might come with specific requirements, if it's government-funded there is usually a larger range of options. A PhD program can be a mixture, too.

It's not uncommon to change the exact scope of the research over time. I don't want to clog the thread with plumbing analogies: In experimental particle physics it's common to start with some sort of service task - something necessary to run the detector like calibration, work on hardware and so on. During that time someone else might start the data analysis you planned to do, or some other analysis is now more interesting because some theorist published new predictions, or the accelerator didn't collect enough data to make this analysis promising, or whatever else might happen. In the US where the PhD doesn't start with research the time span where things can happen is even longer.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
172
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top