Help w/ Proof in Category Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the proof of the existence of direct products in the category of torsion abelian groups, denoted as Tors. The proof involves defining the torsion subgroup T of the direct product P of an indexed family of torsion abelian groups {A_i}_{i ∈ I}. Key components include the inclusion map j : T → P and projection maps π_i : P → A_i. The discussion clarifies the notation used in the proof, specifically the evaluation of function-valued functions, leading to a deeper understanding of the relationship between the maps and the groups involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torsion abelian groups
  • Familiarity with category theory concepts
  • Knowledge of homomorphisms in group theory
  • Basic understanding of function-valued functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of torsion abelian groups in detail
  • Learn about direct products in category theory
  • Explore the concept of function-valued functions and their applications
  • Investigate the role of homomorphisms in category theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, category theorists, and students studying algebra who seek to understand the structure and properties of torsion abelian groups and their direct products.

mathsss2
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I don't understand this proof, specifically the part in red, I don't understand. Please help me understand this step in the proof. Thanks!

Let Tors be the category whose objects are torsion abelian
groups; if A and B are torsion abelian groups, we define \text{Mor}_{\text{\textbf{Tors}}}(A, B) to
be the set of all (group) homomorphisms \phi : A \rightarrow B. Prove that direct
products exist in Tors; that is, show that given any indexed family {A_i}_{i \in I}
where each A_i is a torsion abelian group, there exists a torsion abelian group
which serves as a direct product for this family in Tors.


Proof- Let T be the torsion subgroup (that is, the subgroup of elements of finite
order) of P = \prod_{i \in I} A_i = \{f : I \rightarrow A_i : f(i) \in A_i \text{ } \forall i\}; here of course
P is the direct product of \{A_i\}_{i \in I} in the category Ab. Let j : T \rightarrow P be
the inclusion and for each i \in I, let \pi_i : P \rightarrow A_i denote the usual projection
map; that is, \pi_i(f) = f(i). (In coordinate notation, \pi_i(a_0, a_1, \ldots) = a_i.)
For each i \in I define \tau_i : T \rightarrow A_i by \tau_i = \pi_i * j. I claim that the group
T together with the maps \{\tau_i\}_{i \in I} constitute a direct product for A_{i \in I} in
Tors. Well, given a torsion group S and maps \sigma_i : S \rightarrow A_i for each i \in I,
one defines h : S \rightarrow T as follows: given s \in S, let h(s) \in T be the function
defined by \color{red}{[h(s)](i) = \sigma_i(s)}. Then clearly \tau_i * h = \sigma_i \text{ } \forall i \in I. Moreover,
if h' : S \rightarrow T is any other map such that \tau_i * h' = \sigma_i, then for any s \in S and
i \in I, \color{red}{[h(s)](i) }= (\tau_i * h)(s) = \sigma_i(s) = (\tau_i * h')(s) = \color{red}{[h'(s)](i)}, so h = h'.


I don't understand what \color{red}{[h(s)](i) = \sigma_i(s)} is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Function-valued functions can be confusing; I've always found that stepping through the notation in painstaking detail is very helpful.

By definition, h : S --> T
Therefore, h(s) \in T
By definition of T, h(s) is a function I \to A_i
h(s)(i) is, therefore, evaluating h(s) at i. (And h(s)(i) \in A_i)
 
Hurkyl said:
Function-valued functions can be confusing; I've always found that stepping through the notation in painstaking detail is very helpful.

By definition, h : S --> T
Therefore, h(s) \in T
By definition of T, h(s) is a function I \to A_i
h(s)(i) is, therefore, evaluating h(s) at i. (And h(s)(i) \in A_i)

Got it, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K