B Help w/ repairing/refurbishing an equatorial mount

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a malfunctioning equatorial mount, specifically addressing issues with the RA and Dec joints that are now spinning freely after a repair attempt. The user initially tightened the axial bolt to fix slippage but ended up causing excessive looseness, leading to concerns about the role of a missing threadless pin that may have been crucial for preventing free rotation. After some investigation, it was determined that the pins likely serve as extensions of the locking knobs, which helped restore functionality to the mount. The user also reflects on the importance of friction in the system and considers the impact of greasing on the mechanism's performance. The conversation concludes with the user successfully achieving first light with their scope and expressing a desire to upgrade their equipment for better imaging.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,814
TL;DR Summary
I should have quit when I was ahead.
My eq mount was not behaving - the RA joint was slipping in its socket. There was too much play. So I repaired it once, tightening the axial bolt. The problem is that if I tighten it too much, it binds. So I've taken it apart a second (actually, third) time and cleaned it and regreased it. And this time I made sure the worm gear was properly engaging.

But in doing so, I've made it worse. Both the RA and the Dec joint now spin freely. The worm gear is engaging (I have double-checked this), but there is nothing to prevent the entire unit rotating on the six-inch bolt. There has to be something that locks the bolt to the barrel, so that the only rotation is via the worm gear dials.

In both joints, a piece fell out that I can't seem to figure out where it came from. It is a threadless, featureless pin - maybe 1/4" in diameter and 3/8" inch long, just like this:
1735007859259.png

It seems to me, if it had a home in the right place it could perfectly fulfill the task of stopping any free rotation of the mechanism. But I can't find a hole anywhere it might sink in to.

To be clear: I am not talking about the external manual locking pins, that lock the rotation completely, as indicated here:
1735007539908.png


The pins I knocked out (if these are what's wrong) are (presumably) internal.



I'm trying to find an exploded view of an eq mount to examine, but no joy.

Help!

This appears to be my scope - an Orbitor 4000:
1735006865134.png
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
There has to be something that locks the bolt to the barrel, so that the only rotation is via the worm gear dials.
You should have some friction in the clamps, so you can physically move the telescope to a target, then allow it to track without slipping. That freedom to move, also protects the worm gear from excessive force.
 
Baluncore said:
You should have some friction in the clamps, so you can physically move the telescope to a target, then allow it to track without slipping. That freedom to move, also protects the worm gear from excessive force.
Yes. That's the way it was before.

But it is now so loose that it won't even hold up its own weight.

I am wondering if I should not have greased the parts I greased. I find it hard to believe the axial bolt gripped the gear by friction alone (it was very tight - I had to use some gentle taps of a hammer to take the axial bolt out of the gear). If it is supposed to be gripped by friction alone, then I have done A Bad Thing with the grease.

Baluncore said:
That freedom to move, also protects the worm gear from excessive force.
Yeah. Upon further reflection, this makes me sad, because it makes me realize it cannot be held in place by a pin. It's got to be friction.

OK so these pins are probably still the right thing but they must be on a spring, to provide the necessary friction. I wonder if the springs saw a chance at freedom and made a break for it without me noticing.

Or is it possible that the pins fit inline with the manual locking knob, like a spacer?
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
I am wondering if I should not have greased the parts I greased.
I would wash off the grease with white spirits, then see if I can make paper washers to provide friction between the metal surfaces.

DaveC426913 said:
I find it hard to believe the axial bolt gripped the gear by friction alone (it was very tight - I had to use some gentle taps of a hammer to take the axial bolt out of the gear).
I have little idea what the pins might have done. Maybe they pinned the worm wheel in place to counter torque.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Stating the obvious: it's not going to work right until you figure out where the pins go. Put the grease question aside til then.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
gmax137 said:
Stating the obvious: it's not going to work right until you figure out where the pins go. Put the grease question aside til then.
Yeah. They've got to be in the same hole as the manual locking knobs. i.e. per the diagram.
(Not the same as my mount, but at least we can talk to the diagram)

I'll try that tomorrow.

1735014331444.png
 
No sign of the pins here...

Nor here:
 
gmax137 said:
Stating the obvious: it's not going to work right until you figure out where the pins go. Put the grease question aside til then.
That seems to have done the trick. They seem to be an extension of the locking knobs. I stuck them in there and now the scope seems to work fine. We'll see how it works with first light.

Thanks!

Now I'm off in search of a camera-USB eyepiece and a collimator, each ideally for <$100. (If this works out, I can always upgrade them).
 
I bought this $50 SvBONY 105 as a proof of concept.
1735768333225.png


Took a while to get it working; I was afraid there was some compability issues, and I might have to pack it back up and return it.

So I am pleased to see First Light:

Capture_00001.png

(It's day here and the only thing far enough away to focus on is a neighbor's roof.)

The collimator has not arrived yet so it's pretty crummy alignment after sitting in storage for several years. The spider adjustor bolts are literally rattling in their sockets.

Cross my fingers I can get it all set up before Saturn's rings are completely edge-on. :-p
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and davenn
  • #10
I feel your pain, Dave. The last two times I've tried imaging I've run into some technical issue that I can't resolve. Both times when I set up my autoguider and start guiding, instead of smoothly moving to follow the guide star, the telescope 'jumps' between two positions and I end up with a double image. It's like the commands are being sent to move the mount, but nothing happens for 10+ seconds until finally something 'gives' and the telescope jumps to the other side of the guide star and then the whole repeats in the other direction. I don't know if something is sticking or what.

I have an Atlas-EQG mount that I bought in 2010, so I'm wondering if I need to grease it up or do some other tune up.
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
I feel your pain, Dave. The last two times I've tried imaging I've run into some technical issue that I can't resolve. Both times when I set up my autoguider and start guiding, instead of smoothly moving to follow the guide star, the telescope 'jumps' between two positions and I end up with a double image. It's like the commands are being sent to move the mount, but nothing happens for 10+ seconds until finally something 'gives' and the telescope jumps to the other side of the guide star and then the whole repeats in the other direction. I don't know if something is sticking or what.

I have an Atlas-EQG mount that I bought in 2010, so I'm wondering if I need to grease it up or do some other tune up.
You're one up on me with that motorized mount.

I've finally got some proper night viewing happening.
This is Venus:
Venus_00001.png

And now I'm getting down to some nittier-grittier problems. Objects cross the camera's viewfinder in about a minute. Since my mount is manual, I have to constantly tweak it to stay in view. That's going to become an even bigger problem if I want to zoom to see more than a fat dot.
 
  • #12
I didn't realize yours wasn't motorized. I'll be honest. Even a cheap GoTo EQ mount is probably well worth the money. It's so nice to just be able to center your object and then not have to touch the mount again.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top