Help with a Mathematical Induction Problem

Walshy1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose we want to prove that: 1/2 * 3/4 ... 2n-1/2n < 1/sqrt(3n)

for all positive integers.
(a) Show that if we try to prove this inequality using mathematical induction, the basis step works, but
the inductive step fails.(b) Show that mathematical induction can be used to prove the stronger inequality: 1/2 * 3/4 ... 2n-1/2n < 1/sqrt(3n+1)

So far I have proven the basis step works in part a by plugging in 1, however, I do not know how to say the inductive step fails. I have no clue on part b. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inductive step would require you to show that

$$\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4} \cdots \frac{2n-1}{2n} \cdot \frac{2n+1}{2(n+1)} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{3(n+1)}}.$$

Following the inductive step, we know that

$$\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4} \cdots \frac{2n-1}{2n} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n}},$$

therefore we can conclude that

$$\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3}{4} \cdots \frac{2n-1}{2n} \cdot \frac{2n+1}{2(n+1)} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{3n}} \cdot \frac{2n+1}{2(n+1)}.$$

Now do a simple test: take $n=1$. Our expression yields $\approx 0.43$, whereas the proposed one generates $\approx 0.40$. Our inductive step fails! :p

You should proceed the same way for the next item, bearing in mind that now the inequality will be true. ;)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top