Help with Blackbody: Doubling \lambda_{max} with Temp Increase

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between temperature and the maximum wavelength (\lambda_{max}) of a blackbody cavity. When the temperature increases such that the rate of emission of spectral radiation doubles, the new maximum wavelength is calculated to be \frac{1}{{\sqrt[4]{2}}} = 0.84\,\lambda_{max,1}. This indicates that as temperature rises, the maximum wavelength decreases, confirming that higher temperatures result in shorter wavelengths due to increased frequency. The calculations provided are verified as correct by participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of blackbody radiation principles
  • Familiarity with Planck's law and Wien's displacement law
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and temperature scales
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Wien's displacement law in detail
  • Explore the implications of the Stefan-Boltzmann law on thermal radiation
  • Learn about the derivation and applications of Planck's law
  • Investigate real-world applications of blackbody radiation in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying thermodynamics or optics, particularly those interested in the properties of blackbody radiation and its applications in various scientific fields.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
At a given temperature, [tex]\lambda_{max}[/tex] for a blackbody cavity = 6500 angstroms. What will [tex]\lambda_{max}[/tex] be if the temperature of the cavity walls is increased so that the rate of emission of spectral radiation is doubled?

[tex] R_T = \sigma T^4 \,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,T^4 = \frac{{R_T }}{\sigma }\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,T = \sqrt[4]{{\frac{{R_T }}{\sigma }}}\,\,\,[/tex]

[tex]\lambda _{{\rm{max}}} = \frac{\alpha }{T}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda _{{\rm{max,2}}} = \frac{\alpha }{{T_2 }} = \frac{\alpha }{{\sqrt[4]{{\frac{{R_{T,2} }}{\sigma }}}}} = \frac{\alpha }{{\sqrt[4]{{\frac{{2R_{T,1} }}{\sigma }}}}}[/tex]

Just looking at the formula, it seems the answer should be [tex]\frac{1}{{\sqrt[4]{2}}} = 0.84\,\lambda _{{\rm{max,1}}}[/tex]

But shouldn't the max wavelength go up if the temperature is going up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It just dawned on me. Shoudn't the frequency to up, causing the wavelength to shorten, in which case, I might have done it correctly? Can someone double check that I did this right?
 


tony873004 said:
It just dawned on me. Shoudn't the frequency to up, causing the wavelength to shorten, in which case, I might have done it correctly? Can someone double check that I did this right?

Yes, higher energies mean higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths; it looks good to me:approve:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K