Help with Monotonic Sequence Convergence

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lisa91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the monotonicity and convergence of the sequence defined by \(\frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}\). Participants explore its behavior, particularly in the context of applying the Leibniz test for convergence of the alternating series \(\sum (-1)^n \frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest differentiating the function \(f(x) = \frac{2\ln x}{\sqrt{x+1}}\) to show that it is decreasing for \(x > 9\), while noting that it initially increases from \(n=1\) to \(n=8\).
  • Others propose that the limit of the sequence might equal zero, raising questions about the convergence of the series.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving divergence of the series, despite initial thoughts of using the Leibniz test.
  • Another participant argues that Wolfram Alpha's output does not definitively indicate convergence or divergence, suggesting that it may not always be accurate.
  • There is a discussion about the conditions under which \(2x + 2 < x \ln(x)\) holds, with attempts to find suitable values of \(x\) to demonstrate the sequence's monotonicity.
  • Some participants note that the sequence is decreasing for \(n \geq 10\) and speculate about the slow convergence of the alternating series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the convergence of the series, with some believing it converges based on the Leibniz test, while others reference Wolfram Alpha's results suggesting divergence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall behavior of the series.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the sequence's behavior at lower values of \(n\), and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps related to the application of the Leibniz test.

Lisa91
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me out with the monoticity of this sequence please?
\frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}. It should decline. I am investigating the convergence of one series and I need it to do the Leibniz test.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lisa91 said:
Could anyone help me out with the monoticity of this sequence please?
\frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}. It should decline. I am investigating the convergence of one series and I need it to do the Leibniz test.
Let $f(x) = \frac{2\ln x}{\sqrt{x+1}}$. Differentiate it, and show that $f'(x)<0$ whenever $x>9$. This will show that the sequence $\frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}$ decreases from $n=9$ onwards. Notice that this sequence does not decrease to start with, in fact it increases from $n=1$ up to $n=8$. But that does not matter when investigating convergence, because convergence is unaffected by ignoring the first few terms.
 
I end up with e^{2x} \cdot e^{2} &gt; x^{x}. Is it ok? What shall I do with it?

Does the limit of this guy equal zero?
 
what you are looking for is $x$ such that:

$2x + 2 < x\log(x)$ (you want $f$ to be DECREASING).

note that if $x>e$ the RHS is increasing faster than the LHS, so if we find some $x>e$ with the above inequality true, the LHS will never "catch up" for larger $x$.

one $x$ we might try is:

$x = e^2$, unfortunately:

$2e^2 + 2 > 2e^2$.

how about $x = e^2 + 2$?
 
When x = e^{2} +2 we get 2x+2&lt; x \ln(x). So, this is not what I want.

Ok, I thought I could solve it on my own but it seems to be much more complicated. I have a series \sum (-1)^n \frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}. I thought I could use the Leibniz test but even wolfram alpha shows that the series doesn't converge. Could you give any hints how to prove the divergence of this series?
 
Lisa91 said:
When x = e^{2} +2 we get 2x+2&lt; x \ln(x). So, this is not what I want.

Ok, I thought I could solve it on my own but it seems to be much more complicated. I have a series \sum (-1)^n \frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}. I thought I could use the Leibniz test but even wolfram alpha shows that the series doesn't converge. Could you give any hints how to prove the divergence of this series?

Hi Lisa91, :)

Refer Opalg's post #2 and you can show that \(\frac{\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}\) is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers. Then by the Leibniz test the series \(\sum (-1)^n \frac{\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}\) converges.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Do think wolfram alpha is wrong in this case?
 
Lisa91 said:
Do think wolfram alpha is wrong in this case?

Yes, wolfram is not always correct. :) Can you link me to the answer that wolfram gave? >>Here<< is what I got using wolfram. Note that it doesn't say anything about convergence/divergence.
 
Lisa91 said:
When x = e^{2} +2 we get 2x+2&lt; x \ln(x). So, this is not what I want.

Ok, I thought I could solve it on my own but it seems to be much more complicated. I have a series \sum (-1)^n \frac{2\ln(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}. I thought I could use the Leibniz test but even wolfram alpha shows that the series doesn't converge. Could you give any hints how to prove the divergence of this series?

how so? you want $2x+2$ to be dominated by $x\log(x)$, for this means that:

$\displaystyle f'(x) = \frac{2x+2 - x\log(x)}{(2x)(x+1)(\sqrt{x+1})} < 0$

that is, f is decreasing.

in fact: $e^2 + 2 \sim 9.389$ so the sequence:

$\displaystyle \frac{2\log(n)}{\sqrt{n+1}}$

is definitely decreasing for $n \geq 10$

my input for the series you seem to actually want on wolframalpha is here:

sum from n=1 to infinity (-1)^n(2log(n))/((n+1)^(1/2)) - Wolfram|Alpha

it merely says the results are inconclusive, but if you look at the partial sums for 600 terms, you can see it's very SLOWLY starting to converge.

by the way the function:

$\displaystyle f(x) = \frac{2\log(x)}{\sqrt{x+1}}$

is quite "flat", so the convergence of your original sequence (and it does converge, to 0, in fact) is very slow.

my guess is that it (the alternating series) converges to around 0.127 or so...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K