• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Help With Problem About 1-D Motion

  • Thread starter Pat2666
  • Start date
  • #1
33
0
Okay, so I thought I was on the right track with this problem, but clearly I haven't been getting the right answer!

The problem is as follows :

A physics instructor drives down to St. Louis to see his mom. Coming back, he drives the first half the distance at 65 km/hr and the second half of the distance at 100 km/hr. What is his average speed coming back from St. Louis ?

Okay, so I was trying to determine the t for the two distances and did the following work :

Well I was going to just post a scan of my work, but it says I can't so I'll just give some of what I did...

---

I used t=x/v to solve for the initial t and final t.

So... t initial = x initial / 65km/hr and t final = x final / 100km/hr

Then I plugged those into the equation for average velocity = change in x / change in t

So... V avg = (x - x initial) / [(x / 100) - (x initial / 60)]

---

I think I've gotten to the right point, but if the initial distance and final distance are the same I would just get zero, so I know I'm doing something wrong. Any help would be appriciated! :)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
70
0
K, unless I'm very useless at the moment and dumb which happens from time to time... at first, i thought since there's 2 half distances... you add the 2 speeds, and divide them by 2.... giving 82.5km/h but i figured that was wrong.

The other way I tried was...

the total distance is 'x' and V_avg = dist/time

since you dont know time... you have to add in


V_avg = x / [(dist/2)/V1 + (dist/2)/V2]

= x / [(x/2)/65 + (x/2)/100 ]

= 78.78km/h


For some reason that seems wrong, but I gave it a try.
 
  • #3
238
0
Hello.
In your equation, "V avg = (x - x initial) / [(x / 100) - (x initial / 60)]" you also said that the initial distance x and final distance are the same then. If that was so, then the numerator would be zero. In your case, the initial "x_initial" would be 0 and x would be the total distance traveled.

==========================
By definition of average speed, v=(total distance traveled)/(total time traveled)
Let x = total distance traveled, let x1 = distance of first half, x2=distance of second half, and x1=x2
Let t = total distance traveled, let t1= time of first half traveled, t2= time of second half
Let v1=velocity of first half, v2= velocity of second half

We know that v1=x1/t1, and v2=x2/t2
Then, 65km/hr=(x1/t1) and 100km/hr=(x2/t2). Since x1=x2, then substitute we get:
100km/hr*t2=65km/hr*t1
We can solve for t1=(100/65)*t2 (Eq 1.)

Thus, the average speed would be (x1+x2)/(t1+t2)=(x1+x2)/((100/65)*t2+t2)
by substituting (eq. 1 for t1). Continue from here, we get
t2=x/(2*100km/hr) (Eq. 2)
average speed = x/((100/65)+1)*(x/(200))...
after some simplification, then average speed = 200/(100/65+1)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
lukas86 is showing you the correct way to set it up. Though lukas86 probably shouldn't have given the numerical answer. Your attempt is something like correct also. If xinitial is the distance for the first part of the trip and x is the distance for the last, then xinitial=x. But the total distance isn't x-xinitial. It's x+xinitial. You should be adding the times in the denominator as well.
 
  • #5
70
0
Ya sorry, I realized that after I posted it. When I looked at it I was like... ya, I'm about the only one that understands what I mean, I posted it fast partially because I'm at work and should be doing... well... work haha. Although physics relates to my job so I thought it would be good to refresh my head a bit. I have written on paper what konthelion has pretty much, but my post was vague and confusing I'm sure. I posted a thread, but either of you familiar with the TI-89 calculator (titanium)?
 
  • #6
33
0
Thanks you guys! I kept making xinitial 1/2 of xfinal and was getting the wrong answer...besides the fact that I was calculating the change in distance/change in time when I now realize that it's really just the total trip thanks to you lukas! I knew the x value for both velocities had to be the same, but I just couldn't grasp it at first haha

Thanks again and I'm sure I'll be back soon enough with more questions! :)
 

Related Threads for: Help With Problem About 1-D Motion

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
632
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
450
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top