MHB Henry's question at Yahoo Answers concerning a surface of revolution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the surface area generated by rotating the parametric curve defined by x = 3t² and y = 2t³ around the y-axis for t in the interval [0, 5]. The formula used for the surface area is S = 2π∫ x(t)√((dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)²) dt, leading to the integral S = 36π∫ t³√(1+t²) dt. Various substitutions are applied to simplify the integral, including trigonometric and geometric substitutions, ultimately yielding a complex expression for S. The final result is expressed in terms of π and involves square root terms. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful substitution to streamline the computation process.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus 2 help me please?

Find the surface area generated by rotating the given curve about the y-axis.

x = 3t^2, y = 2t^3, 0 ≤ t ≤ 5

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus 2 help me please? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Henry,

We are asked to find the surface of rotation of the curve described parametrically by:

$x(t)=3t^2$

$y(t)=2t^3$

with $t$ in $[0,5]$.

Since the axis of rotation is the $y$-axis and $x(t)$ is non-negative on the given interval for $t$, we may use:

$\displaystyle S=2\pi\int_0^5 x(t)\sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt} \right)^2+\left(\frac{dy}{dt} \right)^2}\,dt$

So, we compute:

$\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dt}=6t$

$\displaystyle \frac{dy}{dt}=6t^2$

and we have:

$\displaystyle S=2\pi\int_0^5 3t^2\sqrt{\left(6t \right)^2+\left(6t^2 \right)^2}\,dt$

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_0^5 t^3\sqrt{1+t^2}\,dt$

Now, let's use the substitution:

$\displaystyle t=\tan(\theta)\,\therefore\,dt=\sec^2( \theta)\,d \theta$ and we have:

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_0^{\tan^{-1}(5)} \tan^3(\theta)\sqrt{1+\tan^2(\theta)}\,sec^2( \theta)\,d \theta$

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_0^{\tan^{-1}(5)} \tan^3(\theta)\sec^3(\theta)\,d\theta$

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_0^{\tan^{-1}(5)} \frac{\sin(\theta)(1-\cos^2(\theta))}{\cos^6(\theta)}\,d\theta$

Now, let's try the substitution:

$u=\cos(\theta)\,\therefore\,du=-\sin(\theta)\,d \theta)$ and we have:

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_{\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}}^{1} \frac{1-u^2}{u^6}\,du$

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\int_{\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}}^{1} u^{-6}-u^{-4}\,du$

$\displaystyle S=36\pi\left[\frac{u^{-5}}{-5}-\frac{u^{-3}}{-3} \right]_{\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}}^{1}$

$\displaystyle S=\frac{12\pi}{5}\left[5u^{-3}-3u^{-5} \right]_{\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}}}^{1}$

$\displaystyle S=\frac{12\pi}{5}\left(\left(5(1)^{-3}-3(1)^{-5} \right)- \left(5\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}} \right)^{-3}-3\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{26}} \right)^{-5} \right) \right)$

$\displaystyle S=\frac{12\pi}{5}\left(5-3-130\sqrt{26}+2028\sqrt{26} \right)$

$\displaystyle S=\frac{12\pi}{5}\left(2+1898\sqrt{26} \right)$

$\displaystyle S=\frac{24\pi}{5}\left(1+949\sqrt{26} \right)$
 
Just a remark to reduce computations ..

Here we don't need a geometric substitution :S=36\pi\int_0^5 t^3\sqrt{1+t^2}\,dt

rewrite as S=18\pi\int_0^5 2t \cdot t^2\sqrt{1+t^2}\,dtWe can use the substitution u=1+t^2 \,\,\Rightarrow \,\, t^2=u-1so we have du=2t\, dtThe integral becomes as the following :S=18\pi \int_1^{26} (u-1)\sqrt{u}\,duS=18\pi \int_1^{26} \sqrt{u^3}-\sqrt{u}\,du
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top