Hermitian Operator C: Eigenfunctions and Eigenvalues

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhazelm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the operator C defined by C phi(x) = phi*(x). The original poster questions whether C is a Hermitian operator and explores the implications of this on the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the conditions for C to be Hermitian and discuss the implications of C not being Hermitian on the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. They explore the eigenvalue equation and consider the nature of the eigenvalues, particularly whether they can be real or complex.

Discussion Status

Some participants have reached tentative conclusions about the eigenvalues being 1 or -1 based on the nature of the eigenfunctions. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these eigenvalues and the characteristics of the corresponding eigenfunctions. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between real and complex eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, and there is mention of the potential for multiple eigenvalues depending on the assumptions made about the eigenfunctions.

mhazelm
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok, here is another little pickle. I am trying to determine what the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are for the operator C that is defined such that C phi(x) = phi*(x).
Part a wants to know if this is a Hermitian operator. Parts b,c want eigenfunctions and eigenvalues.

Homework Equations



If an operator is Hermitian, then C=C^t, where ^t is the adjoint symbol.

The Attempt at a Solution



From parts b and c and the fact that the section preceding this problem is called "Properties of Hermitian Operators", we might expect C to be Hermitian. BUT - here's what I found:

If we assume C is Hermitian, that would mean that

< phi| C psi> = <phi | psi*> = \intphi* psi* dx

which would have to also equal

< C^t phi| psi> = < C phi| psi> = < phi* | psi> = \intphi psi dx

and I would argue that in general these two integrals are strictly not the same!

This would imply that C is not Hermitian, but if C isn't, then I haven't the foggiest idea how to speculate what the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are. It seems like there's a mistake and it should be Hermitian so that I can just assert that it has real eigenvalues and orthogonal (normalizable) eigenfunctions.

What's the deal? :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are certainly correct that C is not hermitian. That doesn't mean it doesn't have eigenvalues. The eigenvalue equation is C(psi(x))=psi^*(x)=lambda*psi(x). Write that as (a(x)-b(x)*i)=lambda*(a(x)+b(x)*i) where a(x) and b(x) are real. Now I hope they are only asking for real eigenvalues. If that's the case what does that tell you about a and b and lambda? If they weren't careful to specify real eigenvalues then there are lots of them for psi(x)=constant. But they aren't very interesting.
 
Last edited:
Hm, well, if we have two complex numbers set equal to each other I think that means that their real and imaginary parts must be equal. This would imply that lambda = 1 or lambda =-1.
 
mhazelm said:
Hm, well, if we have two complex numbers set equal to each other I think that means that their real and imaginary parts must be equal. This would imply that lambda = 1 or lambda =-1.

Right! And if lambda=1 what does that mean about the eigenfunction? Ditto for -1. Note all of this only works for lambda real.
 
not as sure this time... can we substitute in each eigenvalue and see what happens?

If I use lambda =1, we get b(x) = 0, so the eigenfunction is related to a(x) (or the real part of phi).

If we try lambda = -1, then a(x) = 0 and the eigenfunction is related to b(x) (imaginary part of phi).

is that right? this is all very exciting.. I love it when things begin to work! :-p
 
Yes, if psi is real the eigenvalue is 1. Is psi is purely imaginary then the eigenvalue is -1.
 
that's fabulous! this problem has made me happy. There is hope for the operators that aren't Hermitian!

Thanks for the help! :smile:
 
If C had only real eigenvalues it would be hermitian and we know it's not. Can you also characterize the complex eigenvalues and eigenfunctions? Try writing the function in polar form psi(x)=r(x)*exp(i*theta(x)). I think we actually should have gone that way to begin with, come to think of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K