Higgs fermion … the march is over … ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tiny-tim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion Higgs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Higgs fermion candidate reportedly being studied at the Albanian reactor at Loöf Lirpana. Participants explore various aspects of this topic, including theoretical implications, experimental results, and the relationship to existing models in particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the Higgs fermion candidate and its implications, questioning its compatibility with established theories like superstring theory.
  • There are claims that if the Higgs fermion is a fermion, it could break Lorentz invariance, which raises concerns about its theoretical validity.
  • Others argue that the Higgs must be a boson due to its role in the Higgs mechanism, which involves symmetry breaking under the Lorentz group.
  • Some participants mention the need for hard experimental results from the Loöf Lirpana reactor to confirm any findings related to the Higgs fermion.
  • There are humorous exchanges and skepticism regarding the legitimacy of the Albanian reactor and its findings, with some participants suggesting it may be a ruse for foreign aid.
  • One participant humorously notes that the reactor is an anti-particle accelerator, indicating a playful tone in parts of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the Higgs fermion or its implications. There are multiple competing views regarding its theoretical status and the validity of the experimental claims from the Albanian reactor.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the uncertainty surrounding the experimental results and the theoretical frameworks being referenced, with participants acknowledging gaps in knowledge and understanding.

tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
25,837
Reaction score
258
Physics news on Phys.org
tiny-tim said:
Good morning everyone! :smile:

What do people think of the Higgs fermion candidate reportedly being studied at the Albanian reactor at Loöf Lirpana? … :confused:


I heard reports that it was found at an accelerator in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
 
George Jones said:
I heard reports that it was found at an accelerator in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.

Hi George! :smile:

erm … wasn't that the µ-ose particle? :redface:
 
George Jones said:
I heard reports that it was found at an accelerator in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.

*chuckles*
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi George! :smile:

erm … wasn't that the µ-ose particle? :redface:

I'm not sure, but I think Chauncey might know. :biggrin:
 
George Jones said:
I'm not sure, but I think Chauncey might know. :biggrin:

Well, the vacuum is like a box of chocolates …

… without the menu slip … ! :smile:

Seriously, though … do people think an sHiggs particle can possible be compatible with 26-dimensional superstring theory? :frown:
 
I think it breaks Lorentz Invariance if it is a fermion...
 
tiny-tim said:
Well, the vacuum is like a box of chocolates …

… without the menu slip … ! :smile:

Seriously, though … do people think an sHiggs particle can possible be compatible with 26-dimensional superstring theory? :frown:

Note that super string theory is not internally consistent in 26 dimenions. It's in 10 dimensions (or 11 dimensions if non-perturbative effects are taken intoc account and M-theory is considered)
 
… yes … 10 (or 11) dimensions … !

Thanks, nrqed! :smile:

So I'm thinking that if the Albanian result can be repeated at a more mainstream institution, that would be pretty good confirmation that today we live in 10 (or 11) dimensions?!

It's days like this that make life so good! :smile:

What do other people think … ?
 
  • #10
[urgent]

Doesn't anyone have any thoughts on this? :confused:

I googled "Higgs-fermion" and got about 3,000 hits, but none of them seems relevant … :frown:

Help me, someone, pleeeze! :smile:

:redface: … I need answers before midday! … :redface:
 
  • #11
BenTheMan said:
I think it breaks Lorentz Invariance if it is a fermion...

I think most likely if there are mediating particles it seems from what I know, which is by no means a lot, A boson and graviton configuration would make the most sense. In fact no mediation at all by particles probably makes more sense than a fermion. Is that what you mean tiny-tim? Are you talking about the current effort to look for the Higg's Boson rather than a fermion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

Explains why the current theoretical model expects a boson - gauge boson configuration with a neutral particle.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Hi Schrödinger's Dog! :smile:

Thanks for replying!

I was primarily concerned about the hard experimental results from the Loof Lirpana reactor (well, hard if confirmed), rather than with dubious mathematical theory.

Perhaps our new link with Scientific American (I saw your post there) might throw some light on this? :smile:
 
  • #13
tiny-tim said:
Hi Schrödinger's Dog! :smile:

Thanks for replying!

I was primarily concerned about the hard experimental results from the Loof Lirpana reactor (well, hard if confirmed), rather than with dubious mathematical theory.

Perhaps our new link with Scientific American (I saw your post there) might throw some light on this? :smile:

I'm afraid I've not heard anything about this experiment, and like you say Google is equally quiet?
 
  • #14
George Jones said:
I heard reports that it was found at an accelerator in the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.

Another one of their schemes to get foreign aid from the U.S., no doubt. :rolleyes:
 
  • #15
… strange that it's only in Albania …

Schrödinger's Dog said:
I'm afraid I've not heard anything about this experiment, and like you say Google is equally quiet?

hmm … what you might call "believable but incredible". :frown:
 
  • #16
Schrödinger's Dog said:
I think most likely if there are mediating particles it seems from what I know, which is by no means a lot, A boson and graviton configuration would make the most sense. In fact no mediation at all by particles probably makes more sense than a fermion. Is that what you mean tiny-tim? Are you talking about the current effort to look for the Higg's Boson rather than a fermion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

Explains why the current theoretical model expects a boson - gauge boson configuration with a neutral particle.

Hi Schroedinger---

Fermions are charged under the Lorentz group. Giving things vacuum expectation values automatically breaks the symmetries which they are charged under---this is how the higgs mechanism works. This higgs is charged under SU(2)xU(1), so it breaks SU(2)xU(1) when it gets a VEV.

Because physics is Lorentz Invariant inasmuch as we can tell, the higgs MUST be a boson. Otherwise we wouldn't have 4-d Lorentz invariance.

This is how I understand it---if I am mistaken please let me know.
 
  • #17
jtbell said:
Another one of their schemes to get foreign aid from the U.S., no doubt. :rolleyes:
But they have weapons of mass destruction.

It's nice to see that America has adopted the Duchy's constitution of having an hereditary president and hereditary opposition.
 
  • #18
BenTheMan said:
Hi Schroedinger---

Fermions are charged under the Lorentz group. Giving things vacuum expectation values automatically breaks the symmetries which they are charged under---this is how the higgs mechanism works. This higgs is charged under SU(2)xU(1), so it breaks SU(2)xU(1) when it gets a VEV.

Because physics is Lorentz Invariant inasmuch as we can tell, the higgs MUST be a boson. Otherwise we wouldn't have 4-d Lorentz invariance.

This is how I understand it---if I am mistaken please let me know.

Ben you know more than me. I was aware that the Higgs was expected to be commutative not anti commutative. But beyond that? So I'll take your word for it. Like I said I'm not an expert in this area. :smile:

Er correction not an expert on any area. :-p

tiny-tim said:
hmm … what you might call "believable but incredible". :frown:

EDIT: Well it is believable, credible? :biggrin: But nonsense. ie April 1st
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Well, the morning is over now, even in Alaska …

Perhaps I should have mentioned that Loöf Lirpana is an anti-particle accelerator? :redface:

(Technically, it's a Newton III series equal-and-opposite reactor.)

Did I get anyone?

Own up now! :smile:
 
  • #20
Only until I read the thread title. The March is over... hehe.

If you quote my last post, you'll notice that I wasn't fooled for long. Good one though. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K