High Frequency Linear Array BeamForming

Click For Summary
High Frequency Linear Array beamforming research is being conducted using a 100-channel linear Rx array with a 14.3mm inter-channel spacing, receiving signals from a Tx probe operating at 420 KHz. The setup includes a water tank measuring 12m x 8m x 8m, with simultaneous data acquisition at 2Msamples/s/channel using synchronized NI ADC cards. The initial beamforming results show higher side lobes than expected, leading to inquiries about potential issues in processing or setup. Discussions highlight the need for effective anti-aliasing filters, calibration of the system, and the impact of reflections in the water tank on signal quality. The conversation emphasizes the importance of addressing these technical challenges to improve beam pattern results.
  • #31
Baluncore said:
1. The separation between the elements in the array is 14.3mm, which is much greater than the wavelength of 3.52 mm. That will lead to ambiguity of received phase. The main lobe will have a null at Atan( 3.52 / 14.3 ) = 13.82°;
The 100 element * 14.3 mm = 1430 mm long array will require a rigid mounting with alignment accurate to better than 0.3 mm at the ends of the array.

3. Can you describe the physical connections for the channels. Where are the filters and pre-amplifiers located, and are all the interconnections the same length. I would look for hum loops where ground currents flow in signal cables, or through the water.
As separation is greater than (wavelength/2), 'grating lobes' occurs but beyond +/-6 deg. That's why only +/-5 deg sector has been used here. The sensors are mounted on a rigid water tight hollow cylinder outer surface with preamplifiers/filters fitted inside the hollow cylinder. There is approx. 0.5m coaxial cable b/w sensor and corresponding preamplifier. The two water sealed 18m long cable sets each carrying 50 preamplifiers/filters output goes to surface through two glands in hollow cylinder.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Changing the RX array position very slightly changes the RX phase differences significantly. That suggests there is cross-coupling between the signals somewhere other than in the water.
I can't see how to progress investigating signal integrity without all detailed circuit and mounting information. Such as;
nauman said:
The sensors are mounted on a rigid water tight hollow cylinder outer surface with preamplifiers/filters fitted inside the hollow cylinder.
What is the tube made from? Is it grounded? How and where are the signals and power supply grounded.
Or;
nauman said:
The two water sealed 18m long cable sets each carrying 50 preamplifiers/filters output goes to surface through two glands in hollow cylinder.
Are the 18 m long cables each 50 twisted pairs, or 50 coaxial cables. How are the two ends of those transmission lines terminated to prevent reflection? and what about cross-talk?

When you compare the phase of an element against the two adjacent elements, is the phase difference of the first few cycles the same as the difference for the last few cycles, or does phase vary during the RX pulse? Are some, or all, channels unreliable?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K