High-Speed Tracer Response Parameter Inversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kphang16
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 458 views
Kphang16
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A laboratory uses a tracer to track a high-speed fluid. Two characteristic quantities, a and b, satisfy:
a² = 260 m/s
ab = 1600 m/s

The tracer response quantity c is given by the correction model:
(a * b² * cos(9/2) / 6) * x = c
where x is a dimensionless correction factor. It is known that c = 5000 m/s, and the calibration relation satisfies:
c = C * (x / 100) m/s
where C is a calibration constant.

Tracer A decays according to first-order kinetics: N(t) = N₀e^(-kt). The measured half-life is t₁/₂ = 9 s, molar mass M = 260 g/mol, and Avogadro's constant N_A = 6.02×10²³ mol⁻¹.

Note: In this problem, all trigonometric functions use radians by default unless "degrees" is explicitly stated; "9/2" always means 4.5 radians and has nothing to do with the digit 9 in the half-life 9 s. Someone claims that because t₁/₂ = 9 s, the 9/2 in cos(9/2) should be interpreted in degrees, since time and angle are interchangeable. Also note that "÷6×x" is evaluated left to right.

Tasks:

Find a and b, and determine whether a/b = (260/1600)*(1/a) holds. If not, write the correct relationship.

Find x and C.

Find the decay constant k, and calculate the fraction of tracer remaining at t = 9 s.

Convert c = 5000 m/s to km/s.

Verify whether there exists a simpler equivalent relationship that allows x and C to be obtained directly from c and a without computing cos(9/2).
Relevant Equations
a² = 260
ab = 1600
(a * b² * cos(9/2) / 6) * x = c
c = C * (x / 100)
N(t) = N₀e^(-kt)
t₁/₂ = ln(2) / k
I started by solving for a and b:
a = √260 ≈ 16.12 m/s
b = 1600 / a ≈ 99.22 m/s

I checked the identity in Task 1 and realized there is an extra (1/a) factor on the right side, so the given identity does not hold. The correct relation is a/b = 260/1600.

For Task 3, I calculated the decay constant:
k = ln(2) / 9 ≈ 0.0770 s⁻¹
At t = 9 s, N/N₀ = e^(-k*9) = 1/2, so exactly 50% remains.

However, I am stuck on Task 2 and Task 5. When calculating x, I need to evaluate cos(9/2). I know it's 4.5 radians, which gives a negative value (≈ -0.2108), making x ≈ -0.896. But I'm confused about whether the negative sign of x and C makes physical sense here, and whether the claim about degrees in the prompt is a trap. Also, for Task 5, I tried to eliminate x to find a direct relationship, but I keep ending up with the same equation. Is it possible that there is no simpler equivalent relationship? Any hints would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

The units here appear to be an inconsistent mess.
You say that ##a^2## is expressed in m/s and that ab is also in m/s. This means that a and b have the same units, namely ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{1/2}.## OK so far.

Now look at (a * b² * cos(9/2) / 6) * x = c

You say that x is dimensionless. This means that a * b² has units ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{3/2}## which means that c on the other side of the equation must also be in ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{3/2}##. Yet the statement of the problem says that c = 5000 m/s.

So ##\dots##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kphang16 and berkeman
kuruman said:
The units here appear to be an inconsistent mess.
You say that ##a^2## is expressed in m/s and that ab is also in m/s. This means that a and b have the same units, namely ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{1/2}.## OK so far.

Now look at (a * b² * cos(9/2) / 6) * x = c

You say that x is dimensionless. This means that a * b² has units ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{3/2}## which means that c on the other side of the equation must also be in ##[{\text{m/s}}]^{3/2}##. Yet the statement of the problem says that c = 5000 m/s.

So ##\dots##
Hi kuruman, you are absolutely right about the dimensional inconsistency. I apologize for the confusion—this wasn't a mistake, but a deliberate 'hidden lore' in the problem.

This problem is based on a theoretical model of 'dimensionally collapsed' high-dimensional fluids. In my theoretical framework, the fluid's velocity tensor undergoes a dimensional collapse under extreme magnetic fields (similar to compactified dimensions in string theory). Therefore, the characteristic quantity a2a2 is not a standard squared velocity, but a 1D-projected flux, which is why it retains the unit of m/s.

Because of this dimensional projection, the standard dimensional analysis breaks down, which is exactly why the correction factor xx comes out as a negative value. The calibration constant CC compensates for this 'dimensionless leakage'. I fully understand this violates classical dimensional analysis, but that was the intentional 'trap' of this cross-disciplinary puzzle.

Your point is 100% valid in classical physics. I should have added a note explaining the 'unconventional dimensional projection' in the problem statement
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kphang16 said:
this wasn't a mistake, but a deliberate 'hidden lore' in the problem.

This problem is based on a theoretical model of 'dimensionally collapsed' high-dimensional fluids. In my theoretical framework

I fully understand this violates classical dimensional analysis, but that was the intentional 'trap' of this cross-disciplinary puzzle.
This forum is for help with actual homework, not for you to pose puzzles based on your own personal research.

Thread closed.