Higher energies and shorter distances

  • Thread starter ghery
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Energies
In summary: E=mc^2 tells you how much energy you need to create it.In summary, in experimental HEP, higher energies are associated with shorter distances because the energy scale relates to the length scale that can be probed. To reach higher energies or shorter distances, an increase in the size of the detectors is needed. This is because the energy of the "probe particle" determines how deep and close one can gain information. Additionally, the limitations of current accelerating structures, such as those made of copper, require the use of longer accelerators to reach higher energies. In circular accelerators, the large diameter is necessary to prevent energy losses due
  • #1
ghery
34
0
Hi:

In experimental HEP, Why are higher energies associated with shorter distances , and by the way, in order to reach higher energies or shorter distances, an increase in the size of the detectors is needed, Could you please tell me why?. For instance Why do we meed a particle accelerator as big as the LHC to obtain 14 TeV, couldn`t they just build a smaller accelerator that reached the same energy?

Thans a lot for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ghery said:
Hi:

In experimental HEP, Why are higher energies associated with shorter distances , and by the way, in order to reach higher energies or shorter distances, an increase in the size of the detectors is needed, Could you please tell me why?. For instance Why do we meed a particle accelerator as big as the LHC to obtain 14 TeV, couldn`t they just build a smaller accelerator that reached the same energy?

Thans a lot for your help

I was hoping that someone in high energy physics would answer at least the first part. Oh well.

The energy scale relates to the length scale that can be probed. If you have keV electrons, for example, and you shoot it at an atom, you can then probe up to the atomic length scale since that is all those electron can interact. Anything else at the nuclear level is shielded. It means you need higher energy probe, and that includes using other particles such as protons, etc. So the higher the energy of the "probe particle", the deeper and closer you can gain some information.

Hitoshi Murayama had http://aac08.lbl.gov/plenarytalks/PL01_Murayama.pdf" he did at the last Advanced Accelerator Workshop this past Aug. that you might want to check (note: the download takes about a minute or so). On Page 26 of his presentation, he has some rough estimate on an energy scale relating to a length scale.

As for the second part on why the particle accelerators have to be so big (technically, why it has to be so LONG), it is more of a technical/physics issue. Currently, the accelerating structure that is commonly used is made out of ordinary metal, usually copper. These copper structures appear to have a physical limitation in the amount of RF gradient that it can withstand before undergoing a catastrophic electrical breakdown (currrently ~50 MV/m). Thus, to give charge particles a higher energy, we have to stack many of these one after another, so that the acceleration is done in stages. That's why to get to TeV scale, such accelerator facility tends to be very long. It is all due to these accelerating structures.

So the obvious question following that is, in circular accelerator such as the one at the Tevatron and LHC, where the particles can be accelerated each time it comes back around and passes through these accelerating structures again and again, why do they have to be so big in diameter? The naive answer: losses due to synchrotron radiation. As you make the speed and energy of the particles larger and larger, the curvature of the path will cause even more radiation being emitted. This will not only affect the energy of the particles rather quickly. Furthermore, we also need to remember that we're accelerating not just one or two particles, but rather bunches of them. These energy losses can easily create a wider energy and momentum spread in each bunch, something you don't want since a larger variation in each bunch may get amplified each time it passes through an accelerating structure.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
why we need so big?

- momentum (and energy) depends on radius and magnetic field of the accelerator:
[tex] p = 0.3*B*r [/tex]
where B is in Teslas and r is the radius in metres -> gives you p in units GeV/c

then:
[tex] E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 [/tex]

Why need high energy to see small things?
- In order to resolve objects, one needs wavelengths of the same order or smaller to see diffraction patterns, you can't see atoms in solids using ordinary light, you must use things that has shorter wavelenghts - use electron beams.
- Associated with a particle is a wave property, see deBroigle wavelength.
- Also one wants high energy in accelerators to create new, heavy, particles
 

1. What are "higher energies" and "shorter distances" in the context of physics?

"Higher energies" typically refer to particles or systems that possess a larger amount of energy, such as those found in the subatomic realm. "Shorter distances" refer to the spatial scale at which these particles or systems interact with each other, which is typically measured in units of length (e.g. nanometers or femtometers).

2. How do higher energies and shorter distances affect the behavior of particles?

At higher energies and shorter distances, particles behave in ways that are not observed at lower energies and longer distances. This is because at these scales, the fundamental forces of nature (such as electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces) come into play and can have a significant impact on the behavior of particles.

3. What is the relationship between higher energies and shorter distances?

There is a direct relationship between higher energies and shorter distances. As particles are accelerated to higher energies, they are able to probe smaller and smaller distances, allowing scientists to study the fundamental building blocks of matter and the forces that govern them.

4. What are some examples of experiments that study higher energies and shorter distances?

Some examples of experiments that study higher energies and shorter distances include the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, which collides particles at extremely high energies to study the fundamental nature of matter; the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), which studies the interactions of particles at high energies using a linear accelerator; and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), which studies the behavior of particles at extremely small distances by observing gravitational waves.

5. Why is it important to study higher energies and shorter distances?

Studying higher energies and shorter distances is crucial for understanding the fundamental laws of nature and the behavior of matter at its most basic level. This knowledge can lead to advancements in fields such as technology, medicine, and energy, and can also help us gain a deeper understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
28
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
810
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
69
Views
12K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top