Hint as to how to solve an integral differential equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation that includes an integral component, specifically in the context of RLC electrical circuits. Participants explore various methods for addressing this type of equation, including numerical approaches and transformations into different forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about solving a differential equation with an integral part, specifically in an RLC circuit context.
  • Another suggests transforming the equation into a second-order differential equation, noting that electric current is the time derivative of charge.
  • A different participant mentions the use of Laplace Transforms as a potential method for solving the equation.
  • One participant discusses the concept of numerical solutions, referencing a difference engine and differential analyzer that transform differential/integral equations into difference equations.
  • There is a question about the numerical solvability of second-order differential equations, which is affirmed by another participant who explains the process of converting it into two first-order equations.
  • A later reply provides a detailed derivation of the differential equations for both series and parallel RLC circuits, including transformations and redefinitions of constants.
  • The same reply discusses the characteristic equations and methods for finding homogeneous and particular solutions, emphasizing the utility of Laplace transforms for solving linear ODEs with constant coefficients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods for approaching the problem, but there is no clear consensus on a single solution method. Multiple competing views on how to handle the integral differential equation remain present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the applicability of different methods, such as the use of Laplace transforms and numerical techniques, without resolving the conditions under which these methods are most effective.

barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
I know how to solve a differential equation using Eulers method but what if the equation has an integral part?

i.e. a RLC electrical circuit.

Vsource = iR + L di/dt + (1/C)int i dt

can this be done? a link to how to solve this would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way is to turn it into a 2nd order diffeq. Since electric current is the time derivative of change in charge (Q), you have I = dQ/dt and di/dt = d2Q / dt2. Another way is to use Laplace Transforms, if you've learned that.
 
I am reading a book called "The Innovators". It mentions a difference engine and a differential analyzer, that is digital, that solves differential equations.
I assume that the differential/integral equation is transformed into a difference equation that is solved numerically. I want to know how this is done. It seems like one would assume a small value for deltaT and then incrementally solve the problems.
 
scottdave. can a 2nd order diff eq be solved numericlly?
 
Thanks, I think I have enough to go forward.
 
Hello.

The differential equation for a second order system like an RLC circuit (series) driven by a voltage source and an RLC circuit (parallel) driven by a current source is derived, as suggested above, by taking the derivative on both sides:

$$
v(t) = i(t) R + L i'(t) + \dfrac{1}{C} \displaystyle \int i(t) \,\,\,\, \text{dt}
$$
You take the first derivative, on both sides, and multiply by one over L
$$
\dfrac{v'(t)}{L} = i''(t) + i'(t) \dfrac{ R}{L} + \dfrac{ i(t)}{LC}
$$
Now we redefine the constants:
$$
\text{Damping ratio} \,\,\,\,\,\delta = \dfrac{R}{2L} \,\,\,\,\, \text{Resonant frequency squared} \,\,\,\,\, {\omega_{r}}^{2} = \dfrac{1}{LC}
$$
Then the equation becomes:
$$
\dfrac{v'(t)}{L} = i''(t) + 2 \delta i'(t) + {\omega_{r}}^{2} i(t)
$$
The same derivation is done for a parallel RLC circuit where voltage is the same (as they are in parallel):
$$
i(t) = \dfrac{v(t)}{R} + \dfrac{1}{L} \displaystyle \int v(t) \,\,\,\,\, \text{dt} + C v'(t)
$$
Multiplying throughout by one over C, after taking the first derivative:
$$
\dfrac{i'(t)}{C} = v''(t) + \dfrac{v'(t)}{RC} + \dfrac{v(t)}{LC}
$$
You redefine the constants:
$$
\text{Damping ratio} \,\,\,\,\,\alpha = \dfrac{1}{2RC} \,\,\,\,\, \text{Resonant frequency squared} \,\,\,\,\, {\omega_{r}}^{2} = \dfrac{1}{LC}
$$
The equation then becomes similar to the series one:
$$
\dfrac{i'(t)}{C} = v''(t) + 2 \alpha {v'(t)}+ {\omega_{r}}^{2} {v(t)}
$$
The characteristic equations of both the differential equations are the same:
$$
x^{2} + 2 cx + {\omega_{r}}^{2}
$$
Where ## \text{DF = the damping factor for a parallel or series configuration as defined earlier} ##
You solve for the homogeneous solution using the quadratic equation (as is used for second order LINEAR ODEs):
$$
x ={ - \text{DF}\pm \dfrac{\sqrt{4(\text{DF}^{2} - {\omega_{r}}^{2}) } }{2} }{ }
$$
The homogenous response depends on the values of the damping factor and resonant frequency. The particular solution of this differential equation depends on the nature of the forcing function, exponential forcing functions result in exponential, purely sinusoidal can be solved using impedences, others with their corresponding methods.

$$
\textbf{The laplace transform: Finding the homogeneous solution, particular, and with initial values (if given). }
$$
The laplace transform is thus preferred to solve such linear ODEs with constant coefficients.
The transform allows you to express the output, current or voltage as well as the homogeneous (source free) response, in one go, as well as considering the initial conditions of the circuit. So its probably the easiest and least time consuming method for solving such ODEs.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K