History of the term "square-cube law?"

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The Bill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Law Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical origins and usage of the term "square-cube law" within scientific communities. Participants explore the terminology's development, its recognition across different languages, and its application in various fields of science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes familiarity with the concept's history but seeks information specifically about the term's origin and its adoption in scientific discourse.
  • Another participant expresses unfamiliarity with the term and suggests it may not have a mathematical origin, proposing that it could be more common in engineering contexts.
  • A participant questions whether the term might be confused with the "inverse square law," indicating a lack of recognition of the square-cube law.
  • Several participants reference Wikipedia articles but clarify that they are looking for more detailed historical context regarding the terminology rather than the law itself.
  • One participant mentions the Montgolfier brothers and their balloons as a relevant example of the square-cube law's application, particularly in aerostats.
  • Another participant suggests a resource for tracking the origins of words and phrases, indicating a potential avenue for further exploration.
  • A participant introduces the related concept of "surface to volume ratio" as another term that might yield useful information through research.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the origins or common usage of the term "square-cube law," with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate limitations in their knowledge of the term's historical context and its recognition in different languages, suggesting that the discussion is constrained by these gaps in information.

The Bill
Messages
373
Reaction score
146
I'm familiar with the history of the concept of the square-cube law going back to Galileo, Watt, etc. However, I don't know the origin and history of the language we use to talk about it today. When was the specific term "square-cube law" coined? When did that name become commonly used/understood in the scientific communities where it is useful?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Physics news on Phys.org
I have never heard of it and there is no German Wikipedia page either. The French call it scale effect. Adding both leads me to the assumption that it is not of mathematical origin. My first thought was Kepler, but this is something else. My second thought was: typical engineer's language.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
The Bill said:
When was the specific term "square-cube law"
I have never heard of it either ??

are you sure you didn't mean the inverse square law ?
 
Dr. Courtney said:
I already read that. I'm looking for information on the history of how the term has been used in each field of science. That article is about the law itself, not the terminology and the specific level of detail I'm asking about the history of that terminology.
 
The Montgolfier brothers and their balloons come to mind. The Wikipedia article that you already read includes a remark about aerostats:

Aerostats generally benefit from the square–cube law. As the radius (##r##) of a balloon is increased, the cost in surface area increases quadratically ( ##r^2##), but the lift generated from volume increases cubically ( ##r^3##).​
 
While I never heard of the square-cube law either, I am familiar with the related term "surface to volume ratio". Googling that might also produce useful information.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K