Homo Sapien vs. Chimpanzee - Divergence Timeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Murdstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence homo
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the divergence timeline between Homo sapiens and chimpanzees, specifically addressing the genetic differences and evolutionary implications. It is established that Homo sapiens diverged from a common ancestor with chimpanzees approximately 6 million years ago, with a genetic difference of about 3%. A calculation error regarding the number of different base pairs was highlighted, correcting the figure to 923,953. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding evolutionary processes and the shared ancestry of both species, as well as the complexities of genetic similarity beyond mere base pair comparisons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic genetics, including DNA structure and function.
  • Familiarity with evolutionary biology concepts, particularly speciation and common ancestry.
  • Knowledge of genetic mutation rates and their implications in evolutionary timelines.
  • Awareness of genomic analysis techniques, including comparative genomics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Endless Forms Most Beautiful" by Sean Carroll for insights into evolutionary biology.
  • Explore "The Making of the Fittest" by Sean Carroll to understand genetic variation and adaptation.
  • Investigate the concept of alternative splicing and its role in proteomic differences between species.
  • Learn about comparative genomics tools and methodologies to analyze genetic similarities and differences.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for evolutionary biologists, geneticists, educators in biology, and anyone interested in the genetic relationship between humans and primates.

Murdstone
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
What is wrong with this logic?

Homo Sapien

1. 46 (diploid) chromosomes
2. 32,185 genes
3. 3,079,843,747 bases (DNA bases A,C,T,G)
4. Homo sapines diverged from chimpanzees 6 million years ago.
5. There is a 3% difference in the genetic makeup of a homo sapien and a chimpanzee.
6. 3,079,843,747 x .03 = 615,968 (number of different bases, in the correct order, that would have to manifest via random mutation and natural selection for homo sapiens to be different from chimpanzees.)

The first error is that 3,079,843,747 x .03 = 923,953

So we have 923,953 different base pairs, in the correct order, that would have to manifest via random mutation and natural selection in only 6 million years.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Murdstone said:
What is wrong with this logic?4. Homo sapines diverged from chimpanzees 6 million years ago.

Really? What's the evidence for that? Chimpanzees and humans have a common ancestor. The earliest known ancestor in the human line is thought to be Austalopithecus followed by H. habilis, H.erectus/ergaster and then H. sapiens.
 
Last edited:
As ever with posts like yours, Murdstone, the strong suspicion has to be that you have a prior agenda and don't really want to listen to the rational, logical, scientific answers to your objection. If you really do want to understand, then my strong recommendation to you is to read a couple of books by a guy called Sean Carroll. He is a front line researcher and writes wonderfully accessible books. The two you need to look for are called 'Endless Forms Most Beautiful' and 'The Making of the Fittest'. In those books, Carroll deals excellently with the whole misunderstanding of what a gene is and what a gene does that leads to a better understanding of why the Human and Chimpanzee gernomes are so similar and yet the morphologies of those two species are so different.
 
Murdstone said:
What is wrong with this logic?

Homo Sapien

1. 46 (diploid) chromosomes
2. 32,185 genes
3. 3,079,843,747 bases (DNA bases A,C,T,G)
4. Homo sapines diverged from chimpanzees 6 million years ago.
5. There is a 3% difference in the genetic makeup of a homo sapien and a chimpanzee.
6. 3,079,843,747 x .03 = 615,968 (number of different bases, in the correct order, that would have to manifest via random mutation and natural selection for homo sapiens to be different from chimpanzees.)

The first error is that 3,079,843,747 x .03 = 923,953

So we have 923,953 different base pairs, in the correct order, that would have to manifest via random mutation and natural selection in only 6 million years.


3 things; first, can you clarify what your question is?

Second: don't forget that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. We didn't evolve from them, so its not as if their genome has remained static this past 5-6 million years either. We've both been evolving from the last common ancestor for equal amounts of time.

Third: the "degree" of similarity between humans and chimpanzees depends upon the "resolution" we are viewing the genome through. Are we talking coding genes? Chromosome homology? Genomes? Etc.
 
bobze said:
Second: don't forget that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. We didn't evolve from them, so its not as if their genome has remained static this past 5-6 million years either. We've both been evolving from the last common ancestor for equal amounts of time.
Precisely!
bobze said:
Third: the "degree" of similarity between humans and chimpanzees depends upon the "resolution" we are viewing the genome through. Are we talking coding genes? Chromosome homology? Genomes? Etc.
Despite our over 98% similarity to the chimp genome our proteome shares only ~80% similarity as those genomic differences are amplified by slightly different alternative splicing, polyadenylation, post-transcriptional modification, post-translational modification etc.
Murdstone said:
Homo sapines diverged from chimpanzees 6 million years ago
Homo sapiens are only 200,000 years old. The homo genus is only ~2.5 million years old. A variety of different genus and species have evolved since we last shared a common ancestor with chimps.
Murdstone said:
So we have 923,953 different base pairs, in the correct order, that would have to manifest via random mutation and natural selection in only 6 million years.
That number isn't as ridiculous as you seem to be implying. Taking a generation as 20 years then 6,000,000/20 = 300,000 generations. This amounts to roughly 3 mutations per generation or 1.5 mutations in the human side of the divergence and 1.5 in the chimp side. That's not unreasonable at all and actually far less than some estimates.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
11K