Graduate Homodyne detection quantum state tomography

Click For Summary
Balanced homodyne detection allows for quantum state tomography, but there is confusion regarding the measurement of the operator R, which involves both discrete photon counts and a continuous spectrum operator qφ. The operator R is derived from the difference in photon counts between two modes, with one mode represented as a coherent state. The challenge arises because the measurement yields discrete counts, while qφ has a continuous spectrum, raising questions about how to obtain the expected values from these measurements. Additionally, typical detectors in homodyne setups are not sensitive to single photons, measuring photocurrents instead, which are proportional to the photon number rather than individual events. This discrepancy highlights the complexities in interpreting results from homodyne detection in the context of quantum state tomography.
Jamister
Messages
58
Reaction score
4
In balanced homodyne detection, it is claimed that one can do state tomography. I understand most of the derivation except one part. Here is a figure describing homodyne detection.

1651239602039.png

the operator that is being measured is
$$ R=N_{1}-N_{2}=a^{\dagger} b+b^{\dagger} a $$.
taking the mode b to be coherent state, we obtain:
$$R=r\left(a^{\dagger} e^{i \phi}+a e^{-i \phi}\right)=\sqrt{2} r q_{\phi}$$.
Now what I don't understand is that what is being measured is discrete photon counts. On the other hand, the spectrum of the operator ##q_{\phi}## is continuous. Therefore, how can obtain ##\langle q_{\phi} \vert \rho \vert q_{\phi} \rangle ## from the measurements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The detectors used for homodyne detection are usually far from being single-photon sensitive. Accordingly, you measure two photocurrents, not individual clicks. These are of course proportional to the photon number present in either detection arm. However, for pulsed operation typical local oscillators consist of 25 million photons per pulse or much more. This is very far from the regime of counting discrete photon detection events.
 
  • Like
Likes Jamister and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
964
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K