MHB How Accurate is Lagrange Interpolation for Approximating Cos(0.75)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on using Lagrange interpolation to approximate cos(0.75) with given cosine values, resulting in an approximation of 0.7313 and an actual error of 0.0004. The error bound calculated is 2.7 × 10^-8, with discrepancies attributed to the precision of the provided data. A user expresses disappointment over a lack of responses to their initial query about the intermediary steps in solving the problem. Other participants encourage sharing the solution for future reference, emphasizing the importance of community support. The conversation highlights the balance between academic integrity and collaborative learning in online forums.
Hero1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Problem:
Use the Lagrange interpolating polynomial of degree three or less and four digit chopping arithmetic to approximate cos(.750) using the following values. Find an error bound for the approximation.

cos(.6980) = 0.7661
cos(.7330) = 0.7432
cos(.7680) = 0.7193
cos(.8030) = 0.6946

The actual value of cos(.7500) = 0.7317 (to four decimal places). Explain the discrepancy between the actual error and the error bound.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Solution:
The approximation of cos(.7500) 0.7313. The actual error is 0.0004, and an error bound is 2.7 × 10-8. The discrepancy is due to the fact that the data are given only to four decimal places.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Can anyone help me figure out the intermediary steps from the problem to solution?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I managed to figure out the solution to the problem myself, however, I am disappointed that no one responded to my thread.
 
Hero said:
I managed to figure out the solution to the problem myself, however, I am disappointed that no one responded to my thread.


Hi Hero,

I'm sorry no one responded to your thread. Over 95% of our threads get responded to, so believe me it's not a normal occurrence. Can you post how you solved the problem for us? Other people in the future might find it useful :)

Jameson
 
Jameson said:
Hi Hero,

I'm sorry no one responded to your thread. Over 95% of our threads get responded to, so believe me it's not a normal occurrence. Can you post how you solved the problem for us? Other people in the future might find it useful :)

Jameson

I can't post it until after the course is over. I don't want my instructor thinking that I stole online content.
 
Hero said:
I can't post it until after the course is over. I don't want my instructor thinking that I stole online content.

You posted the question here hoping someone else would answer it. How is your posting your own work different than someone else posting their work?

I guess if you just won't post your solution, then ok but I don't quite get it. As a rule of thumb I would suggest that you be comfortable with anything you post on this site to be read by anyone.

Again, sorry you didn't get any help but give it one more try and when another question comes up and I'm sure you'll find some help. I'll make sure our staff knows that you have a question if you post next time.
 
Jameson said:
You posted the question here hoping someone else would answer it. How is your posting your own work different than someone else posting their work?

I guess if you just won't post your solution, then ok but I don't quite get it. As a rule of thumb I would suggest that you be comfortable with anything you post on this site to be read by anyone.

Again, sorry you didn't get any help but give it one more try and when another question comes up and I'm sure you'll find some help. I'll make sure our staff knows that you have a question if you post next time.

I will post it
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top