I How accurate is the distance to M4 and its stars according to different sources?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clusters globular
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the varying estimates of the distance to Messier 4 (M4) and its stars, with figures ranging from 5,500 to 12,400 light-years. The accuracy of Gaia's measurements of radial distances and peculiar motions of stars within M4 is questioned, particularly regarding their orbits and eccentricities. There is confusion over the classification of PSR B1620−26, with some sources listing it as a member of M4 while others suggest it is a background object, leading to discrepancies in distance measurements. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on Gaia's capabilities in measuring peculiar accelerations in globular clusters. Overall, the inconsistencies in distance estimates raise concerns about the reliability of current data on M4.
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
How far is M4? I have seen contradictory numbers for M4 and stars in it.
How precise is Gaia in measuring the radial distances to various stars in M4? Their radial position relative to each other? Their peculiar motions?
What kinds of orbits do stars in the outskirts of M4 follow? High eccentricity orbits that bring them to cluster interior on each periapse, or low eccentricity orbits that stay on the outskirts of cluster all along?
Does Gaia have the precision to measure peculiar accelerations of stars in globular clusters?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
snorkack said:
I have seen contradictory numbers for M4 and stars in it.
Where?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
malawi_glenn said:
Where?
This:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_4
offers 7200 ly, (2200 pc) with reference to
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&A...143...8C
But it also claims PSR B1620−26 as a member (rather than a background object), reference to https://esahubble.org/images/potw1236a/
This:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_B1620−26
claims the distance to PSR B1620−26 as 3800 pc (12 400 ly), source:
http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/psr_b1620-26_(ab)_b/
This:
https://www.eso.org/public/images/m4/
quotes 5500 ly
5500 ly and 12400 ly is a gross difference. Does Gaia have any comment?
 

Thread 'Population 3 star (Pop III) candidate LAP1'

"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Neutron star 4U 1820-30 spins at 716 revolutions per second
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
I Non-locality by memory (Jung, 2020) applied to stochastic mechanics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Are Distant Globular Clusters the Key to Testing Newtonian Gravity?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
I How Big of an Object Orbiting Closer to the Sun Than Earth Could Be Overlooked?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Starring Gravity, Co-Starring Magnetism
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Kerbal Space Program - Rocket Design Basics
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Big Bang Big Schmang, astronomical redshift is an artifact of distance
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
I What Key Issues Should Cosmologists Address in the ΛCDM Model?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Universal Structure - Bubble Theory
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
Questions on Redshift, Hubble’s Law, spacetime expansion and the standard model
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K