How, and in what atoms does the Lamb shift occur?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lamb shift, primarily attributed to the Uehling potential from vacuum polarization by virtual electron-positron pairs, results in a measurable energy difference of 205.0073 meV between the 2P1/2 and 2S1/2 states of muonic hydrogen. This phenomenon also occurs in regular hydrogen, albeit to a lesser extent, and is expected to manifest in other hydrogen-like systems due to quantum electrodynamics (QED) effects. The discussion highlights that while the Lamb shift is observed in hydrogen-like atoms, its complexity increases in atoms with more intricate electronic configurations, making calculations more challenging.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with the Uehling potential and vacuum polarization
  • Knowledge of atomic energy levels and transitions
  • Basic concepts of electron distribution in atomic potentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Uehling potential in detail and its implications for atomic physics
  • Study the Lamb shift in various hydrogen-like systems beyond hydrogen
  • Explore the effects of vacuum fluctuations on electron distributions in atoms
  • Investigate the complexities of Lamb shift measurements in multi-electron atoms
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in atomic structure and quantum electrodynamics, particularly those focusing on the Lamb shift and its implications in various atomic systems.

Ali Lavasani
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
The Uehling potential due to vacuum polarization by virtual electron-positron pairs is said to be the dominant contribution — 205.0073 meV — to the Lamb shift between the 2P1/22P1/2 and 2S1/22S1/2 states of muonic hydrogen. In the Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_shift), it is mentioned that the lamb shift is the difference in energy between two energy levels 2S1/2 and 2P1/2 of the hydrogen atom. Is what it says true, and the lamb shift also occurs in the regular (not muonic) hydrogen atom?

The Wikipedia page says that "the fluctuation in the electric and magnetic fields associated with the QED vacuum perturbs the electric potential due to the atomic nucleus. This perturbation causes a fluctuation in the position of the electron, which explains the energy shift". How is the change in the position of electrons related to an energy level shift? Is this concept the same as the Uehling potential? I ask this because as far as I know, the Uehling potential is effective only within a Compton wavelength of the particle producing the electric field. So how is it producing such a great force at a distance way larger than the Compton wavelength of the nucleus, that can dramatically deviate the electrons and cause an energy level shift?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It should occur in every hydrogen-like system, but it was first predicted for and measured with regular hydrogen.
Ali Lavasani said:
How is the change in the position of electrons related to an energy level shift?
All this is a heuristic explanation only, but a smeared out distribution in an nonlinear potential has a different expectation value for the potential than a point-like distribution at its center.
Ali Lavasani said:
Is this concept the same as the Uehling potential?
It looks like it but I'm not sure.

The Lamb shift is tiny for regular hydrogen.
 
mfb said:
It should occur in every hydrogen-like system, but it was first predicted for and measured with regular hydrogen.All this is a heuristic explanation only, but a smeared out distribution in an nonlinear potential has a different expectation value for the potential than a point-like distribution at its center.It looks like it but I'm not sure.

The Lamb shift is tiny for regular hydrogen.
Thanks. Does the lamb shift occur in other atoms, like Helium, Calcium, Iron, Oxygen, etc too? I mean, the QED effects modifying the position of electrons are present everywhere, so why shouldn't they produce lamb shift in other atoms?

And, I'm also curious, how much do vacuum fluctuations smear the electrons? Suppose that the electron is a point within the atom, and gets smeared due to some vacuum fluctuations. I think the distribution should get more and more smeared after a while, and finally the initial point could be find anywhere within the atom, is this true?
 
Thanks! How about non-Hydrogen like atoms or molecules (For example H2O, or Ca2+)? Does the electron smearing and lamb shift occur in the too? Why are all the lamb shift measurements on Hydrogen-like atoms?
 
There will still be a fine-structure, but things get much more complicated. Different states won't be degenerate even with nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.
 
So you mean the only reason that hydrogen-like atoms are being tested for the lamb shift is that the calculations are simpler?
 
Ali Lavasani said:
So you mean the only reason that hydrogen-like atoms are being tested for the lamb shift is that the calculations are simpler?

The Lamb shift is the deviation from the Dirac theory prediction for hydrogen-like atoms that two particular states have the same energy. While the physics underlying the deviation should be present in general for all atoms, it may not be the case that the Dirac theory predicts that the same two states also have the same energy when more complicated electronic configurations are present.
 
atyy said:
The Lamb shift is the deviation from the Dirac theory prediction for hydrogen-like atoms that two particular states have the same energy. While the physics underlying the deviation should be present in general for all atoms, it may not be the case that the Dirac theory predicts that the same two states also have the same energy when more complicated electronic configurations are present.
The physics underlying the lamb shift are vacuum polarization and electron self-energy. What factor are these phenomena dependent on?

If they depend on the electric field, in may atoms the E field the electrons sense is equal or even more that the E field of an H atom's nucleus, because that atoms have stronger nuclei and not much bigger atomic radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K