How and where do I get endorsement for arXiv?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MevsEinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arxiv
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the process of obtaining endorsement for publishing a proof of the Goldbach Conjecture on arXiv. Participants emphasize the importance of seeking endorsement from established mathematicians, preferably at local universities, who will likely require a review of the proposed proof. The conversation highlights the skepticism surrounding claims of novel proofs, referencing historical figures like Andrew Wiles, who validated specific cases before achieving a complete proof. Overall, the consensus is that the likelihood of having a valid proof is exceedingly low, and proper approach and respect for the field are crucial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Goldbach Conjecture
  • Familiarity with the arXiv submission process
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques
  • Awareness of historical proofs in mathematics, such as Fermat's Last Theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the arXiv endorsement process for mathematical submissions
  • Study the proof techniques used by Andrew Wiles for Fermat's Last Theorem
  • Explore the significance of peer review in mathematical publishing
  • Learn about common pitfalls in claiming novel proofs in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers, and students interested in publishing mathematical proofs, particularly those exploring conjectures and seeking endorsement for their work.

MevsEinstein
Messages
124
Reaction score
36
Link to unpublished paper redacted by the Mentors
So I think I found a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture and I want to publish it on arXiv after getting rid of all the small mistakes. But first I need endorsement. How can I prove I deserve it and where can I find someone I can prove to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the overwhelming probability is that you have not found a proof of the Goldbach conjecture. But this is off limits for a discussion on PF since it involves novel research. I am just mentioning it because the number of people who thought they had a proof is large while the number of people with a verified proof is zero.

As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, vanhees71 and berkeman
Orodruin said:
As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
Thanks for the advice!

But about your previous statement, you're suggesting that I shouldn't try to publish a proof. So how were Fermat's last theorem, the Poincare conjecture, and many other previous conjectures solved?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Given this thread from 3 weeks ago: How many correct cases of a conjecture do you need so that it can be valid for your proof?I believe it is even less likely you have a proof. in 3 weeks you say you've gone from not knowing what a proof was to haveing a proof that has stymied mathematicians for centuries. That is really, really unlikely.
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.
 
A bunch of examples does not a proof make.
 
MevsEinstein said:
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.

You will not find any sponsors here at PF. And you should probably learn to make more effort to capitalize the names of scientists that have gone before you, and who you are wanting to stand on the shoulders of... Lordy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K