Other How and where do I get endorsement for arXiv?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MevsEinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arxiv
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an individual claiming to have found a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture and seeking endorsement for publication on arXiv. The general consensus is skepticism regarding the validity of their claim, emphasizing that many have previously believed they found proofs without success. To gain endorsement, it's suggested to approach someone at a local university, but caution is advised as they may identify errors in the work. The individual references historical proofs, like Fermat's Last Theorem, to argue for the validity of their pursuit, but the response highlights that proving a few cases does not equate to a complete proof. The conversation underscores the importance of humility and respect for established mathematicians in the field.
MevsEinstein
Messages
124
Reaction score
36
Link to unpublished paper redacted by the Mentors
So I think I found a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture and I want to publish it on arXiv after getting rid of all the small mistakes. But first I need endorsement. How can I prove I deserve it and where can I find someone I can prove to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the overwhelming probability is that you have not found a proof of the Goldbach conjecture. But this is off limits for a discussion on PF since it involves novel research. I am just mentioning it because the number of people who thought they had a proof is large while the number of people with a verified proof is zero.

As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, vanhees71 and berkeman
Orodruin said:
As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
Thanks for the advice!

But about your previous statement, you're suggesting that I shouldn't try to publish a proof. So how were Fermat's last theorem, the Poincare conjecture, and many other previous conjectures solved?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Given this thread from 3 weeks ago: How many correct cases of a conjecture do you need so that it can be valid for your proof?I believe it is even less likely you have a proof. in 3 weeks you say you've gone from not knowing what a proof was to haveing a proof that has stymied mathematicians for centuries. That is really, really unlikely.
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.
 
A bunch of examples does not a proof make.
 
MevsEinstein said:
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.

You will not find any sponsors here at PF. And you should probably learn to make more effort to capitalize the names of scientists that have gone before you, and who you are wanting to stand on the shoulders of... Lordy.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

Back
Top