How and where do I get endorsement for arXiv?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MevsEinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arxiv
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of obtaining endorsement for publishing a proof of the Goldbach Conjecture on arXiv. Participants explore the challenges of proving such a significant mathematical claim and the necessary steps to gain endorsement from qualified individuals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confidence in having found a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture and seeks guidance on obtaining endorsement for publication.
  • Another participant cautions that the likelihood of having a valid proof is extremely low, referencing the historical context of failed claims regarding the conjecture.
  • Concerns are raised about the participant's rapid progression from not understanding proofs to claiming to have one, suggesting skepticism about the validity of their claim.
  • There is a suggestion that endorsement may be sought from someone at a local university, but that potential endorsers may find errors in the work.
  • One participant references the historical successes of other mathematicians, questioning the discouragement implied by earlier comments about publishing proofs.
  • Another participant emphasizes that having multiple examples does not constitute a proof, reinforcing the need for rigorous validation.
  • There is a critique regarding the participant's approach to seeking endorsement and the importance of respecting the contributions of established mathematicians.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of the original claim regarding the proof of the Goldbach Conjecture. While some express skepticism and caution, others advocate for the pursuit of publication, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of rigorous validation in mathematics and the historical context of conjectures, but there is no consensus on the validity of the claim or the approach to endorsement.

MevsEinstein
Messages
124
Reaction score
36
Link to unpublished paper redacted by the Mentors
So I think I found a proof for the Goldbach Conjecture and I want to publish it on arXiv after getting rid of all the small mistakes. But first I need endorsement. How can I prove I deserve it and where can I find someone I can prove to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, the overwhelming probability is that you have not found a proof of the Goldbach conjecture. But this is off limits for a discussion on PF since it involves novel research. I am just mentioning it because the number of people who thought they had a proof is large while the number of people with a verified proof is zero.

As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, vanhees71 and berkeman
Orodruin said:
As to your question, you would need to search for endorsement from someone who can endorse. They will likely want to see what you are planning to post first. Perhaps someone at a local university, but again don’t be surprised if they find errors- if they even take the time to listen, which may depend on how you approach them.
Thanks for the advice!

But about your previous statement, you're suggesting that I shouldn't try to publish a proof. So how were Fermat's last theorem, the Poincare conjecture, and many other previous conjectures solved?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Given this thread from 3 weeks ago: How many correct cases of a conjecture do you need so that it can be valid for your proof?I believe it is even less likely you have a proof. in 3 weeks you say you've gone from not knowing what a proof was to haveing a proof that has stymied mathematicians for centuries. That is really, really unlikely.
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.
 
A bunch of examples does not a proof make.
 
MevsEinstein said:
I read an article about the proof of fermat's last theorem and it said that andrew wiles proved a few cases of a conjecture before moving on, so I just wanted to make sure. And I can prove to you that I can prove statements.

You will not find any sponsors here at PF. And you should probably learn to make more effort to capitalize the names of scientists that have gone before you, and who you are wanting to stand on the shoulders of... Lordy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K