How are Banach and Hilbert spaces applied in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Banach and Hilbert spaces are essential in the study of quantum mechanics, particularly for theoretical physics. Students interested in theoretical quantum mechanics should take courses in these mathematical concepts to gain a solid foundation. While the focus of such courses is on mathematical rigor and theorem proving, the applications in quantum mechanics are significant, including the isomorphism of \ell^2 and L^2 Hilbert spaces, the Riesz representation theorem, and Parseval equality. Those pursuing experimental physics may find these subjects less relevant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with mathematical rigor and theorem proving
  • Basic knowledge of Hilbert spaces and functional analysis
  • Experience with probability theory in quantum contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Riesz representation theorem in detail
  • Explore the applications of Parseval equality in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the isomorphism between \ell^2 and L^2 Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the implications of Bra-ket notation in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, mathematics students focusing on functional analysis, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

thephystudent
Messages
123
Reaction score
37
As a european bachelor student in physics, i can follow a theoretical math course next year about banach and hilbert spaces. How useful are those subjects for physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to your question depends on a lot of factors. First of all, it depends on what you mean with physics. For example, if your interests are in experimental physics, then the course will be completely useless for the rest of your carreer. Second of all, it depends on what you mean with useful.

The subject of Banach and Hilbert spaces are used a lot in quantum mechanics. If you want to study theoretical quantum mechanics, then these subject will most likely pop up. If you want to get a good foundation in these topics, and if you want to see how these mathematics objects work, then taking the course is a good option. If you just want to do physics and if you are ok with taking some things for granted, then I'm sure you will do fine without such a theoretical math class.

Be aware that you are taking a theoretical math class. The focus will be on mathematical rigor and proving (a LOT of) theorems. Do NOT underestimate such a course. Typically, they will not care about physical applications, so you might want to look these up yourself. Remember: just because it seems without applications doesn't mean that this is true. The opposite is true, actually, I claim that most results in the course actually have some kind of application in physics and have some physical significance.

Here are some examples of physical applications of the course (take this with a grain of salt, I am not a physicist).
  • In the beginning of QM, there were two popular formulations which seemed to work. Nobody knew which one was correct. It was eventually discovered that both theories are actually the same thing. This is because [itex]\ell^2[/itex] and [itex]L^2[/itex] are isomorphic Hilbert spaces.
  • A popular device in QM is of course the Bra-ket notation, where you have bra's <a| and kets |a>. But what are these things actually and why does this notation work? This is answered (essentially) by the Riesz representation theorem that classifies the continuous functionals on a Hilbert space.
  • In QM, we interpret [itex]|<a,b>|^2[/itex] as some kind of probability. But why does this work? For example, why do those probabilities sum to 1? This is answered by the Parseval equality.

If you think about working in theoretical QM, then you should absolutely take this course as it will be helpful (but again, it is not easy).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
726
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K