Undergrad How Are Irrational Numbers Identified Between Rational Number Intervals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kris kaczmarczyk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the identification of irrational numbers within rational number intervals, emphasizing that the set of real numbers (ℝ) is uncountable while the set of rational numbers (ℚ) is countable. It is established that rational numbers are dense in the real number line, meaning between any two real numbers, there exists at least one rational number. The conversation clarifies that no real numbers are missing; all can be accounted for, and it highlights the systematic method to extract a rational number between two given real numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory, specifically countable vs. uncountable sets
  • Familiarity with the concepts of rational and irrational numbers
  • Knowledge of the density property of rational numbers in real numbers
  • Basic understanding of continued fractions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of uncountable sets in set theory
  • Learn about the density of rational numbers in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of continued fractions and their significance in number theory
  • Investigate the implications of the completeness property of real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of real and rational numbers.

kris kaczmarczyk
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Real number are uncountable nonetheless they always have Rational neighbor
count(ℝ) > count(ℚ) ; count(ℚ) == count(ℕ)

But still in-between any members of ℝ, we are quarantine to find element of ℚ

Can someone help me understand: were are these members of ℝ we cannot account for?

For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number

"The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers: every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions. "
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kris kaczmarczyk said:
Summary: Real number are uncountable nonetheless they always have Rational neighbor
No rational number has a "neighbor".
No real number has a "neighbor.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
kris kaczmarczyk said:
Summary: Real number are uncountable nonetheless they always have Rational neighbor
A better way to say this is that the rationals are dense in the real number line. That is, between any two real numbers, there is always some rational number.
kris kaczmarczyk said:
count(ℝ) > count(ℚ) ; count(ℚ) == count(ℕ)

But still in-between any members of ℝ, we are quarantine to find element of ℚ
See above. Also, the word you want is "guaranteed," which is quite different from "quarantined."
kris kaczmarczyk said:
Can someone help me understand: were are these members of ℝ we cannot account for?
What do you mean? No real numbers are missing. We can account for all of them.
kris kaczmarczyk said:
For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number

"The rationals are a dense subset of the real numbers: every real number has rational numbers arbitrarily close to it. A related property is that rational numbers are the only numbers with finite expansions as regular continued fractions. "
 
If it helps, one (relatively) simple way to remember is it that given two real numbers ##r_1,r_2## (where ##r_1<r_2##) we can always systematically extract a rational number ##q## so that ##r_1<q<r_2##. I find this a helpful way to remember this result.

The precise description will probably get a bit complicated due to boundary cases, but here is the general idea via a specific example.
##r_1=0.23459678...##
##r_1=0.23459732...##
The dots indicate that either we don't know (or don't care) about the digits after that.

So to generate ##q## first we copy the initial part where the digits of ##r_1## and ##r_2## are equal. So the first five digits of ##q## (after the decimal point) will be the same as ##r_1## and ##r_2##.

Now if you notice the next two digits in ##r_1##, they are ##6## and ##7##, while in ##r_2## they are ##7## and ##3##.
So we could use any of the following as ##q##:
##q=0.2345968##
##q=0.2345969##
##q=0.2345970##
##q=0.2345971##
##q=0.2345972##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
40K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K