How Are Irreducible Representations of O(3) and SO(3) Derived from SU(2)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The irreducible representations of O(3) and SO(3) can be derived from the irreducible representations of SU(2) through a two-one homomorphic mapping. The key is to utilize the isomorphisms SO(3) ≅ SU(2)/ℤ₂ and O(3) = SO(3) × {-1₃ₓ₃, 1₃ₓ₃}. While numerous resources exist discussing the connection between SO(3) and SU(2), fewer focus on computing all representations of O(3) from those of SO(3) and SU(2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and representations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of homomorphisms and isomorphisms
  • Knowledge of the special orthogonal group SO(3) and the special unitary group SU(2)
  • Basic linear algebra, particularly matrix representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the isomorphism SO(3) ≅ SU(2)/ℤ₂ in detail
  • Explore the mathematical definition and properties of group representations
  • Investigate the implications of the representation theory of O(3)
  • Read literature on the connections between SU(2) and O(3) for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying representation theory, particularly those interested in the relationships between different Lie groups and their applications in quantum mechanics and geometry.

Rory9
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How can irreducible representations of O(3) and SO(3) be determined from the irreducible representations of SU(2)?

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe there is a two-one homomorphic mapping from SU(2) to SO(3); is that enough for some shared representations? If I had an idea of *why* irreducible reps. can determined for O(3) and SO(3) from SU(2), I might have a better notion of *how* to go about proving it.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, what is a representation of a group G?
 
George Jones said:
Mathematically, what is a representation of a group G?

Typically a matrix, I believe, for which \Gamma(T_{1}T_{2}) = \Gamma(T_{1})\Gamma(T_{2}) holds, where T_{1}, T_{2} belong to G
 
There are 2 isomorphisms you need to use:

\mbox{SO(3)}\simeq\frac{\mbox{SU(2)}}{\mathbb{Z}_{2}}

and

\mbox{O(3)} = \mbox{SO(3)} \times \{-1_{3\times 3}, 1_{3\times 3} \}

There are at least 50 books or so discussing the connection b/w SO(3) and SU(2), however there are many less computing all representations of O(3) starting from the ones of SO(3) deducted from the ones of SU(2).
 
Last edited:
bigubau said:
There are 2 isomorphisms you need to use:

\mbox{SO(3)}\simeq\frac{\mbox{SU(2)}}{\mathbb{Z}_{2}}

and

\mbox{O(3)} = \mbox{SO(3)} \times \{-1_{3\times 3}, 1_{3\times 3} \}

There are at least 50 books or so discussing the connection b/w SO(3) and SU(2), however there are many less computing all representations of O(3) starting from the ones of SO(3) deducted from the ones of SU(2).


Thank you very much for your answer. I understand the second statement, but what exactly are you doing in the first - simply slicing off the complex aspect by mathematical fiat?

Cheers :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K