SU(2) Spin-1/2 Representation Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the Pauli matrices, when multiplied by a factor of 1/2, form an irreducible representation of the SU(2) algebra. The confusion arose from the distinction between representations of groups and algebras. While the identity element in a group representation maps to the identity operator, in algebra representations, the binary operation is preserved, leading to the conclusion that the Pauli matrices satisfy the necessary conditions for SU(2) representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(2) algebra and its generators
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of representation theory in mathematics
  • Basic concepts of Lie algebras
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie algebras, focusing on SU(2) representations
  • Explore the mathematical framework of representation theory
  • Learn about the implications of the identity operator in algebra representations
  • Investigate the role of the Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics and particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students interested in quantum mechanics, representation theory, and the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Xenosum
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
In Howard Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics (and other texts I'm sure), it is determined that the Pauli matrices, \sigma_1 \sigma_2 and \sigma_3, in 2 dimensions form an irreducible representation of the SU(2) algebra.

This is a bit confusion to me. The SU(2) algebra is given by
\left[ J_j, J_k \right] = i\epsilon_{jkl}J_l ,
where J_i are the generators. Meanwhile, the Pauli matrices satisfy:
\sigma_a \sigma_b = \delta_{ab} + i\epsilon_{abc} \sigma_c .
But this implies that the zero generator gets mapped to the identity operator in the spin-1/2 SU(2) representation, because \left[ J_a, J_a \right] = 0, while \sigma_a \sigma_a = 1.

Isn't it a condition for any representation of an algebra for the identity element in the algebra to get mapped to the identity operator?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, nevermind.

Firstly it's not exactly the Pauli matrices which form a representation of the SU(2) algebra; rather it is the Pauli matrices multiplied by a factor of 1/2.

Moreover I was mistaken in generalizing the concept of a representation of a group to the concept of a representation of an algebra. In a group, the binary operation always gets mapped to matrix multiplication, no matter what it is. Apparently for an algebra it's a bit different: the binary operation gets mapped to itself, and the matrices are taken to preserve the relationship which is defined on the algebra. Since the Pauli matrices satisfy
\left[ \frac{1}{2}\sigma_a, \frac{1}{2}\sigma_b \right] = i \epsilon_{abc}\frac{1}{2} \sigma_c ,
they form a viable representation of the SU(2) algebra.

Sorry~
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K