How are plantae protists similar and different from plant cells?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yahman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells Plant
AI Thread Summary
Plantae protists and plant cells share similarities as photosynthetic producers and paraphyletic groups. However, they differ significantly in structure and function; protists are primarily unicellular and often microscopic, while plants are multicellular and complex. Protists can exhibit movement, whereas plants are stationary, and there are notable differences in their chlorophyll types and cell wall compositions, with some protists lacking cell walls entirely. Nutritionally, while plants are strictly autotrophic, some protists can be heterotrophic, consuming organic molecules. Additionally, protists display diverse respiratory methods and locomotion capabilities, contrasting with the sedentary nature of plants.
yahman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How are plantae protists similar and different from plant cells?


The Attempt at a Solution



similarity: both are photosynthetic, and producers, both are paraphylitic

differences: protists are unicellular whereas plants are multicellular, plants are big and complex where as protists are microscopic, more diverse and abundant. some protists could move, plants can't move. there are differences in chlorophyll and cell wall composition, also some protists don't have cell wall. I assume that there are reproductive differences (not very certain what it might be, I only know that they have a life cycle called alteration of generation that maybe slightly different from plants). some protists could be heterotrophic where plants can't be.

* any feedback is appreciated, thanks*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yahman said:
How are plantae protists similar and different from plant cells?

The Attempt at a Solution



similarity: both are photosynthetic, and producers, both are paraphylitic

differences: protists are unicellular whereas plants are multicellular, plants are big and complex where as protists are microscopic, more diverse and abundant. some protists could move, plants can't move. there are differences in chlorophyll and cell wall composition, also some protists don't have cell wall. I assume that there are reproductive differences (not very certain what it might be, I only know that they have a life cycle called alteration of generation that maybe slightly different from plants). some protists could be heterotrophic where plants can't be.

* any feedback is appreciated, thanks*

The classification and taxonomy of protists is actually rather complicated and is changing all the time so my textbooks will not be as up to date as the links below.

Wiki states the actual term protist is obsolete

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protist

A comparison list below, I would cross reference this with an up to date micro book. (They use the term protist)

http://www.differencebetween.net/sc...or,Plants are primarily autotrophic producers.
 
The differences between plant cells and plantae protists are:
1. Complexity
Plant cells' nuclear DNA strands are more complicated than protists'. This is because plant cells have the ability to develop into distinct types based on their structure and function thanks to the presence of genes. Plants have the potential to grow into more sophisticated organisms than protists because totipotency promotes the creation of specialized tissues.

In actuality, all plants are multicellular, unlike protozoa. While some protists are unicellular, others reside in colonies of separate cells that interact and work together on activities like feeding and mobility. The protist group only has these colonies. Other protists, like seaweed, are multicellular and can even grow to be quite huge.

2. Nutrition
The main producers are plants, which are autotrophs that make food from inorganic molecules. There aren't any plants that are parasites that depend on other plants for nourishment. Some protists, like algae, are autotrophs that use chloroplasts to perform the photosynthetic process similarly to other protists. Other protists, referred to as heterotrophs or consumers, on the other hand, acquire nutrition in the form of organic molecules.

Several predatory and parasitic species of protists, collectively referred to as "protozoans," prey on bacteria and other protists. Protists have been linked to illnesses in both people and animals. Other protists, such slime molds, which resemble fungi and function as decomposers, are also protists.

3. Respiration
For the process of cellular respiration, oxygen is needed by plants. Protists differ here. While certain protist species are facultative anaerobes, which can break down carbohydrates without the presence of oxygen, some protist species are also aerobes. Even mud and mammalian digestive tracts include obligatory anaerobic protist species. There may be facultative aerobic adaptations in some plant tissues.

4. Movement
Many protists have specific cellular architectures that serve as sensory organs as well as aid in locomotion and eating. Flagella are tail-like organelles that help creatures move in a manner akin to swimming. Cilia are shorter, hair-like structures that are often abundant on the cell membrane's outside. Pseudopodia are cellular extensions that play a sensory role in locating and ingesting food as well as in protist movement.

On the other hand, plants are sedentary forms of life. Tropisms, or movements that only affect a single plant individual's organs, are permitted. While thigmotropism is movement in reaction to a physical stimulation, such the twining of tendrils, phototropism is the movement of plant parts toward sunshine.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top