How are Stereographic Projections Derived in Differential Geometry?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Stereographic projections in differential geometry are derived using specific formulas that relate Cartesian coordinates on a sphere to coordinates on a plane. The projection is defined by the equations (X,Y)=(x/(1-z),y/(1-z)) and its inverse (x,y,z)=(2X/(1+X²+Y²), 2Y/(1+X²+Y²), -1+(X²+Y²)/(1+X²+Y²)). The derivation involves projecting a line from the North pole (0,0,1) through a point (x₀,y₀,z₀) on the sphere to determine its intersection with the plane z=0. This process is straightforward but requires understanding basic geometric principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cartesian coordinates
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts
  • Basic knowledge of geometric projections
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of stereographic projection in detail
  • Explore the properties of differential geometry
  • Learn about geometric transformations and their applications
  • Investigate the inverse stereographic projection process
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential geometry, as well as educators looking to teach stereographic projections and their applications.

niall14
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In cartesian coordinates (x.y,z) on the and (X,Y) on the plane, the projection and its inverse are given by the following formulae:

(X,Y)=(x/1-z,y/1-z)

(x,y,z)=(2X/1+X^2+Y^2, 2Y/1+X^2+Y^2, -1+X^2+Y^2/1+X^2 +Y^2)

This relates to the field of differential geo.Anybody have a proof to where thes equations are derived?

Thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivation is straightforward if not somewhat cumbersome. Do you know how stereographic projection is defined? You take the straightline through a pole and a point on the sphere and project it onto the plane. Consider a fixed point on the sphere (x,y,z) and find the line through the North pole and (x,y,z). Then find where it intersects the plane z=0.
 
thanks for your reply.not really to sure what u mean by 'project'.if you could give me the first few lines of the proof I am sure i could figure it out.
 
I'll give you one direction, the other follows similarly but is definitely the harder direction. Consider the north pole (0,0,1) and let (x_0,y_0,z_0) be a point on the sphere. Then the line between the north pole and this point is given by
x = x_0 t, \qquad y = y_0 t, \qquad z = 1 + (z_0 - 1)t
which is easily calculated via basic geometric results. Notice that when t=0 we get the North pole, and when t = 1 we get the point on the sphere. Now we want to calculate where this line hits the z=0 plane, so in particular
z= 0 = 1+(z_0 - 1)t \quad \Rightarrow t = \frac1{1-z_0}
Substituting this value into the equation of the line we get the intersection of the line with the plane
\left( \frac{x_0}{1-z_0}, \frac{y_0}{1-z_0}, 0 \right)
and we drop the third coordinate since we want to identify the sphere with the plane.

Again, the other direction is a bit harder and more technical, but follows precisely the same idea. Give it a try yourself and see if you can get the right answer.
 
thanks ill give it a go
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K