How are the Hermite Polynomials Defined and Calculated?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DreamWeaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the definition and calculation of Hermite Polynomials, particularly through their recursive relations and explicit forms. Participants explore both the definition using derivatives and the recursive method for generating these polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define Hermite Polynomials using the formula: $$\mathscr{H}_n(x) = (-1)^n e^{x^2}\, \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \Bigg\{ e^{-x^2}\Bigg\}$$
  • Others present the recursive relation for Hermite Polynomials: $$H_{n+1}(x) = 2\ x\ H_{n}(x) - 2\ n\ H_{n-1} (x)$$ along with initial conditions: $$H_{0}= 1, H_{1} = 2\ x$$
  • Several explicit forms of Hermite Polynomials are provided, including $$H_{2} = 4\ x^{2} - 2$$, $$H_{3} = 8\ x^{3} - 12\ x$$, $$H_{4} = 16\ x^{4} - 48\ x^{2} + 12$$, and $$H_{5} = 32\ x^{5} - 160\ x^{3} + 120\ x$$
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the different proofs presented in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present similar definitions and recursive relations for Hermite Polynomials, but there is no explicit consensus on a single method or proof being superior. The discussion remains open to various approaches.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions in the definitions or proofs provided, nor does it explore the implications of the recursive relation in depth.

DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Defining the Hermite Polynomials by:

$$\mathscr{H}_n(x) = (-1)^n e^{x^2}\, \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \Bigg\{ e^{-x^2}\Bigg\}$$Show that

$$\mathscr{H}_5(x) = 32 x^5-160 x^3+120 x$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\[H_5 = -e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^5} }{\mathrm{d} x^5}\left \{ e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^4} }{\mathrm{d} x^4}\left \{ -2xe^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^3} }{\mathrm{d} x^3}\left \{ (4x^2-2)e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^2} }{\mathrm{d} x^2}\left \{ (-8x^3+12x)e^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}\left \{ (16x^4-48x^2+12)e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \left \{ (-32x^5+160x^3-120x)e^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =32x^5-160x^3+120x\]
 
DreamWeaver said:
Defining the Hermite Polynomials by:

$$\mathscr{H}_n(x) = (-1)^n e^{x^2}\, \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \Bigg\{ e^{-x^2}\Bigg\}$$Show that

$$\mathscr{H}_5(x) = 32 x^5-160 x^3+120 x$$

[sp]The recursive relation for Hermite Polynomials is...

$\displaystyle H_{n+1}(x) = 2\ x\ H_{n}(x) - 2\ n\ H_{n-1} (x)\ (1)$

... and is...

$\displaystyle H_{0}= 1$

$\displaystyle H_{1} = 2\ x$

... so that...

$\displaystyle H_{2} = 4\ x^{2} - 2$

$\displaystyle H_{3} = 8\ x^{3} - 12\ x$

$\displaystyle H_{4} = 16\ x^{4} - 48\ x^{2} + 12$

$\displaystyle H_{5} = 32\ x^{5} - 160\ x^{3} + 120\ x$

[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
lfdahl said:
\[H_5 = -e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^5} }{\mathrm{d} x^5}\left \{ e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^4} }{\mathrm{d} x^4}\left \{ -2xe^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^3} }{\mathrm{d} x^3}\left \{ (4x^2-2)e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d^2} }{\mathrm{d} x^2}\left \{ (-8x^3+12x)e^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =-e^{x^2}\cdot \frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x}\left \{ (16x^4-48x^2+12)e^{-x^2} \right \} =-e^{x^2}\cdot \left \{ (-32x^5+160x^3-120x)e^{-x^2} \right \}\\\\ =32x^5-160x^3+120x\]

chisigma said:
[sp]The recursive relation for Hermite Polynomials is...

$\displaystyle H_{n+1}(x) = 2\ x\ H_{n}(x) - 2\ n\ H_{n-1} (x)\ (1)$

... and is...

$\displaystyle H_{0}= 1$

$\displaystyle H_{1} = 2\ x$

... so that...

$\displaystyle H_{2} = 4\ x^{2} - 2$

$\displaystyle H_{3} = 8\ x^{3} - 12\ x$

$\displaystyle H_{4} = 16\ x^{4} - 48\ x^{2} + 12$

$\displaystyle H_{5} = 32\ x^{5} - 160\ x^{3} + 120\ x$

[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Two excellent, elegant, and - even better - different proofs. Thanks for taking part, people! (Sun)

Gethin
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K