prashant singh
- 56
- 2
how aristarchus found that Earth's diameter = 2.5 × moon's diameter . What wrong things he did to calculate the size of moon just like the shodow part.
The discussion revolves around Aristarchus's method for estimating the diameter of the Moon in relation to the Earth. Participants explore the calculations and assumptions made by Aristarchus, questioning the accuracy of his results and the methodology he employed.
The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the accuracy of Aristarchus's calculations and the interpretation of his methodology. Participants express uncertainty about specific values and the implications of those values on the results.
Participants note that the discussion involves unresolved mathematical steps and differing interpretations of Aristarchus's statements, particularly concerning the meaning of "meros" in the context of angular measurements.
You could look him up on the Internet. There are several fine articles there which discuss Aristarchus and his work.prashant singh said:how aristarchus found that Earth's diameter = 2.5 × moon's diameter . What wrong things he did to calculate the size of moon just like the shodow part.
prashant singh said:I want to know why they took (L/S) = (l/s) and how they got (L/t) =(l/t)(180/(pi × theta) and what is theta here
Similar triangles?prashant singh said:Can u explain me only first part please.
sophiecentaur said:Similar triangles?
PF will respond so much better when you appear to have put some effort in, yourself.
What have you actually learned from that Wiki article?
I have spent less than five minutes on the recommended Wiki article and I found:
"The error in this calculation comes primarily from the poor values for x and θ. The poor value for θ is especially surprising, since Archimedes writes that Aristarchus was the first to determine that the Sun and Moon had an apparent diameter of half a degree. This would give a value of θ = 0.25, and a corresponding distance to the moon of 80 Earth radii, a much better estimate. The disagreement of the work with Archimedes seems to be due to its taking an Aristarchos statement that the lunisolar diameter is 1/15 of a "meros" of the zodiac to mean 1/15 of a zodiacal sign (30°), unaware that the Greek word "meros" meant either "portion" or 7°1/2; and 1/15 of the latter amount is 1°/2, in agreement with Archimedes' testimony."
Is this a homework assignment?
Ouch. That was hardly an explanation - not one that could satisfy me, in any event.prashant singh said:No its not a H.W problem but thanks for explaining