How Can a Balancing Scale Help Solve the Mystery of the Counterfeit Coin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SchoolBoyDJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain Type
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving 12 coins, one of which is counterfeit and may weigh either more or less than the others. Participants are tasked with using a balancing scale only three times to identify the counterfeit coin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different grouping strategies, particularly starting with groups of 4 coins. There are discussions about the implications of balance and weight differences observed during weighings.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their reasoning and approaches, while others have raised questions about the effectiveness of certain methods. There is acknowledgment of the need to label the coins and consider the weight implications of the counterfeit coin, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of using the balancing scale only three times and the challenge of determining whether the counterfeit coin is heavier or lighter. There is also mention of the teacher's method of labeling coins, which adds a layer of complexity to the problem.

SchoolBoyDJ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just started physics this year, and we were assigned our first problem today. Before I continue I'd just like to stress that I am not looking for an answer. Just a hint, or something to help me out. Telling me that I'm on the right path would be helpful as well :smile:

Here's the problem:
-There are 12 coins, out of the 12 one is a counterfit.
-11 of the coins weigh the same, the counterfit weighs either more or less than a 'normal' coin.
-The only tool that may be used to solve this problem is a balencing scale, and it may be used only 3 times

So far I've come up with this:

Start off with 3 groups of 4 coins each.

Use Scale 1 Put two groups of 4 on each side of the scale, if they balence then you know that those 8 are all 'real' coins.

From here on I don't know what to do. I believe that you need to use groups of 4, but I'm not positive. What I do know is that you will need 2 procedures, 1 for if the first 2 groups balence, and one for if they don't.

Is my current thinking correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gee, I always hated such 'problems'... Okay.

Scaling 1. Put 4 coins on each side.
1a) equal weight => the different coin is among the 4 coins you're holding. Use Scaling 2 now and put 1 of these 4 coins on each side. 2a) equal weight => use Scaling 3 and put the two coins that are currently on the scale (and weigh equal) one the same side, no matter which one. Now, put the 2 coins on the other side. If that side goes down, you'll know the different coin is a heavier one, and you'll know which one it is because if felt (cheating?!:biggrin: ) heavier in your hands! If the other side goes up, you'll know the different one is a lighter one and you'll know which one it is.
2b) different weight => remember the position of the scale (which side is up, and which one is down). Now use scaling 3 to put the coins on the scale on the same side. Now, put the normal coins which you had in your hands on the other side. If the other side goes down, you'll know the different coin is a lighter one, and you'll know which one it is from scaling 2 (which side was up during scaling 2). If the other side goes up, you'll know the different coin is a heavier one, and you'll as well know which one it is from scaling 2.
1b) different weight => stuck here.. :zzz:
 
Coin-weighing problems can be modeled using decision trees. I won't go into depth about this but I will give you a hint: you need to label the coins.
 
radou said:
Gee, I always hated such 'problems'... Okay.

Scaling 1. Put 4 coins on each side.
1a) equal weight => the different coin is among the 4 coins you're holding. Use Scaling 2 now and put 1 of these 4 coins on each side. 2a) equal weight => use Scaling 3 and put the two coins that are currently on the scale (and weigh equal) one the same side, no matter which one. Now, put the 2 coins on the other side. If that side goes down, you'll know the different coin is a heavier one, and you'll know which one it is because if felt (cheating?!:biggrin: ) heavier in your hands! If the other side goes up, you'll know the different one is a lighter one and you'll know which one it is.
2b) different weight => remember the position of the scale (which side is up, and which one is down). Now use scaling 3 to put the coins on the scale on the same side. Now, put the normal coins which you had in your hands on the other side. If the other side goes down, you'll know the different coin is a lighter one, and you'll know which one it is from scaling 2 (which side was up during scaling 2). If the other side goes up, you'll know the different coin is a heavier one, and you'll as well know which one it is from scaling 2.
1b) different weight => stuck here.. :zzz:

This won't work because your proceedure needs to work. Everything needs to be written out, and work. No guessing, no weighing with hands etc :P
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Coin-weighing problems can be modeled using decision trees. I won't go into depth about this but I will give you a hint: you need to label the coins.


Ohhh...So there is a reason to my teachers madness. He had the 'coins' labeled with different letters. Thanks for pointing this out to me.

P.S. I was thinking more about this and I've gotten this far:

I had thought about the method the other person mentioned, and freaked out- I thought I had it all figured out, when I realized I hadn't found out if the fake coin was heavier or lighter than the others. What a bummer :cry:
 
Well I've confirmed that you must start with groups of 4.
 
hint: why don't you try taking some coins from here and there and weigh them together? Your grouping is correct but grouping sometimes is an unwanted restriction:smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K