How can ampere be considered as base quantity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abi.ayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere Base
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ampere is classified as a base quantity in the International System of Units (SI), defined as the constant current that produces a force of 2 x 10-7 Newton per meter between two parallel conductors. Despite its definition involving time and coulombs, the ampere is treated as a base unit because it allows for more accurate current prototypes compared to charge prototypes. The coulomb, defined as one ampere-second, is considered a derived unit. Future redefinitions of the ampere may involve fixing the electron charge as a constant, enhancing measurement accuracy through time-based definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of base and derived quantities in physics
  • Familiarity with the International System of Units (SI)
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory and Coulomb's law
  • Basic principles of electrical measurements and calibration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the redefinition of SI units, focusing on the ampere and electron charge
  • Explore the principles of electromagnetic force between conductors
  • Learn about the Josephson constant and its role in voltage calibration
  • Investigate the Hall effect and its application in measuring current
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, educators in physics, and anyone involved in precision measurements and calibration of electrical units.

abi.ayan
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Base Quantities are those quantities on the basics of which other quantities can be expressed.
Ampere is also a base quantity.But the unit of ampere is C/s.This shows that ampere depends on time and coulomb.It make sense to consider ampere as a derived unit and coulomb as base unit.But we don't. can anyone explain it please ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a base unit, the "unit of the ampere" is:

that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed 1 meter apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2 x 10-7 Newton per meter of length.

The unit of the Coulomb is one ampere-second. The coulomb depends on the second and the ampere. Not the other way around.
 
abi.ayan said:
Base Quantities are those quantities on the basics of which other quantities can be expressed.
Ampere is also a base quantity.But the unit of ampere is C/s.This shows that ampere depends on time and coulomb.It make sense to consider ampere as a derived unit and coulomb as base unit.But we don't. can anyone explain it please ?
There is an equation

A=C/s
Or
C=A*s

Both ways are equally valid ways of writing the same equation. So in principle you can equally consider the Ampere to be derived from or the Coulomb derived from the Ampere. In practice you can make a more accurate current prototype than a charge prototype, so the Coulomb is the derived unit.

In CGS units you don't even have separate units for EM, they are all derived from mass, length, and time units.
 
It is perhaps worth mentioning that it is very likely that we in a few years time (maybe 2018) will redefine the ampere by first making the electron charge a constant and they use charges/second as the definition (and realization).
This agrees with the general trend of the SI: giving constants an exact value and then somehow connect the realization/definition to time (i.e as was done for the meter). This automatically gives us higher accuracy since we can measure time much more accurately (seveal orders of magnitude) than anything else.

Also, no one actually measures the ampere anymore. All calibrations are in reality done by using the Volt (using the CODATA value for the Josephon constant) and the Ohm (Hall effect), and then Ohm's law.
The reason is -again- that voltage calbrations are extremely accurate (since they depend on time) and so is the Hall effect. The defition of the Ampere is way too awkward to be practical,
 
Especially the bits where it requires infinite conductors, absolute vacuum and wires without cross-section, I guess :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K