How can big O's have values of the form A+B?

  • Topic:
  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 3K views
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
For example according to wikipedia and this question bucket sort has the expected time complexity O(n+k). How does it make sense to use big O notation with arithmetic in it? Is it because it is not known which of n or k will determine the upper bound but once it is known (i.e. the algorithm is implemented) then it would be known if it actually is O(n) or O(k)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
find_the_fun said:
For example according to wikipedia and this question bucket sort has the expected time complexity O(n+k). How does it make sense to use big O notation with arithmetic in it? Is it because it is not known which of n or k will determine the upper bound but once it is known (i.e. the algorithm is implemented) then it would be known if it actually is O(n) or O(k)?

To say that \(f(n,k)\in O(n+k)\) means that there exists a \(C>0\) such that for \(n+k\) large enough:

\[|f(n,k)| < C |n+k|\]

That is they jointly define the bound on the growth of \(|f(x,k)|\)

CB
 
find_the_fun said:
For example according to wikipedia and this question bucket sort has the expected time complexity O(n+k). How does it make sense to use big O notation with arithmetic in it? Is it because it is not known which of n or k will determine the upper bound but once it is known (i.e. the algorithm is implemented) then it would be known if it actually is O(n) or O(k)?

One of the basic property of the 'big-O notation' is that, if f and g are positive functions, then ... $\displaystyle f_{1} \in \mathcal{O} (g_{1})\ \text{&}\ f_{2} \in \mathcal{O} (g_{2}) \implies f_{1}+f_{2} \in \mathcal{O} (g_{1}+g_{2}) $

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$