How Can Boolean Identities Simplify AB'CD+(ABC')'+ABCD'?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around minimizing the Boolean expression AB'CD+(ABC')'+ABCD' using Boolean identities. Participants are exploring various methods to simplify the expression while adhering to the rules of Boolean algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply Boolean identities and laws to simplify the expression. There are questions regarding the correctness of the final answer and whether there are alternative methods that avoid certain theorems, such as DeMorgan's theorem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the final expression derived from the original problem. Others have suggested different approaches, including using a Karnaugh map for simplification. There is an ongoing exploration of various methods and identities without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which require the use of Boolean identities for simplification. There is a focus on logical reasoning and verification of results, with some participants questioning the assumptions made in the calculations.

Duderonimous
Messages
63
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Minimize the following using boolean identities
1. AB'CD+(ABC')'+ABCD'

Homework Equations


Identity 1A=A 0+A = A
Null (or Dominance) Law 0A = 0 1+A = 1
Idempotence Law AA = A A+A = A
Inverse Law AA = 0 A+A = 1
Commutative Law AB = BA A+B = B+A
Associative Law (AB)C = A(BC) (A+B)+C = A+(B+C)
Distributive Law A+BC = (A+B)(A+C) A(B+C) = AB+AC
Absorption Law A(A+B) = A A+AB = A
DeMorgan's Law (AB) = A+B (A+B) = A B

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm going to use lower case letters now.f=ab'cd+(abc')'+abcd'
f'=(ab'cd+(abc')+abcd')'
=(ab'cd)'(abc')''(abcd')'
=(a'+b+c'+d')(abc')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(aa'bc'+abbc'+abc'c'+abc'd')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(abc'+abc'+abcd')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(abc'+abcd')(a'+b'+c'+d')
=(0+0+0+0+abc'c'+abc'c'd'+abc'd+0)
=abc'+abc'd'+abc'd
=abc'+abc'(d'+d)
=abc'+abc'(1)
=abc'
f'=abc'
f=(abc')'

--> f=a'+b'+c

Do this look correct? If so is there a shorter way to minimize it? Is there a way to minimize without using DeMorgan's theorem at the top? Thanks

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't read you calculation, but it seem clear that a and c must both be true, sp your final answer must be wrong. Try actually thinking about the logic, & afterward pick the formal identities to back up your intuition
 
Duderonimous said:

Homework Statement


Minimize the following using boolean identities
1. AB'CD+(ABC')'+ABCD'

Homework Equations


Identity 1A=A 0+A = A
Null (or Dominance) Law 0A = 0 1+A = 1
Idempotence Law AA = A A+A = A
Inverse Law AA = 0 A+A = 1
Commutative Law AB = BA A+B = B+A
Associative Law (AB)C = A(BC) (A+B)+C = A+(B+C)
Distributive Law A+BC = (A+B)(A+C) A(B+C) = AB+AC
Absorption Law A(A+B) = A A+AB = A
DeMorgan's Law (AB) = A+B (A+B) = A B

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm going to use lower case letters now.f=ab'cd+(abc')'+abcd'
f'=(ab'cd+(abc')+abcd')'
=(ab'cd)'(abc')''(abcd')'
=(a'+b+c'+d')(abc')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(aa'bc'+abbc'+abc'c'+abc'd')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(abc'+abc'+abcd')(a'+b'+c'+d)
=(abc'+abcd')(a'+b'+c'+d')
=(0+0+0+0+abc'c'+abc'c'd'+abc'd+0)
=abc'+abc'd'+abc'd
=abc'+abc'(d'+d)
=abc'+abc'(1)
=abc'
f'=abc'
f=(abc')'

--> f=a'+b'+c

Do this look correct? If so is there a shorter way to minimize it? Is there a way to minimize without using DeMorgan's theorem at the top? Thanks

Impressive. I got the same answer via the K-map. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Duderonimous
sorry my mistake, i misread the question. your answer is correct. i would expand the middle term, and then show that it dominates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Duderonimous
Great. Thank you. I found a much quicker way.

f=ab'cd+(abc')'+abcd'
=ab'cd+a'+b'+c+abcd'
=(acd+1)b'+a'+c(1+abd')
=(1)b'+a'+c(1)
=a'+b'+c
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
32K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K