Boolean Algebra: Minimum Sum-Of-Products Expression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the minimum Sum-Of-Products expression for a given Boolean function involving variables a, b, c, and d. Participants are exploring methods to simplify the expression and assess its minimality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to introduce a missing variable to express the function in terms of all variables, leading to a new expression. Some participants discuss the equivalence of different minsum forms and the complexities associated with the original and minimized expressions.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive dialogue about the simplification process, with one providing confirmation of the original poster's approach. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the expressions, and while there is no explicit consensus, the discussion is focused on understanding the minimality of the expression.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of typical expectations in class regarding simplification, with participants noting that achieving a reduction to fewer terms is common. The original poster expresses concern about the perceived lack of minimization in their result.

Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the minimum Sum-Of-Product Expression for:
f = ab'c' + abd + ab'cd'

The Attempt at a Solution



By introducing the missing variable in term 1 and term 2 I can get an expression that has all the variables: a, b, c, and d.

I do so by:

f = ab'c'd + ab'c'd' + abcd + abc'd + ab'cd'

I can combine terms like so: (1 & 2),( 2 & 5), (3 & 4) I get:

f = ab'c' + ab'd' + abd

This hardly seems minimized from the original expression. Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've stated is one of two equivalent minsum forms of that Boolean expression. There are several methods for arriving at these (consensus, Karaugh maps, Quine-McCluskey). I'd examine them for more info.

The original expression has a summand complexity (SC) of 3 and a literal complexity (LC) of 10. The minsum has an SC of 3 and an LC of 9 (as does the other). It isn't much simpler but it as simple as one can get.

--Elucidus
 
Thanks, when you're learning about these concepts it is nice to have confirmation that you are doing things right. Normally it class we get the function down a term or two...or even to one term. So, when I got this down to three terms, with three variables in each term, it didn't really seem minimized. Thanks again!
 
Karnaugh product of sums answer:

a(b+d)(b+c'+d')
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K